Category: Synarchy

Vatican: vincible ignorance on cybersecurity

Published on by Kathy Clubb2 Comments

[UPDATED.] I came across this listing on LinkedIn under the heading, Become a Vatican CyberVolunteer. Surely, this is a joke? What kind of cybersecurity outfit advertises for random volunteers to help them – while simultaneously letting the world know how vulnerable their system is?

About the job

We are a group of talented cybersecurity professionals from all over the world who work daily in companies and organizations in the field of cybersecurity. We dedicate our time and efforts to help bolster and secure the Vatican Cyber defenses by offering free consultancy, hands-on services and cloud services for free or against cost-price.

Vatican City has a sprawling system of websites administered by the Internet Office of the Holy See and organized under the country code top-level domain “.va”. The Vatican’s web presence has expanded steadily since its launched its main website, http://www.vatican.va, in 1995. ( List of websites: http://www.vatican.va/siti_va/index_va_en.htm )

Hackers have frequently targeted the Vatican since it first went online. In 2012, the hacking group Anonymous briefly blocked access to http://www.vatican.va and disabled other sites, including those of the Vatican secretariat of state and the Vatican newspaper L’Osservatore Romano.

A British cyber security consultancy approached the Vatican following reports in July 2020 that suspected Chinese state-sponsored hackers had targeted Vatican computer networks.

The need to secure, like any organization in the world, is very clear in the Vatican, and we like to help.

We’re currently recruiting!

LinkedIn listing

As the listing explains, it wasn’t so long ago that the Vatican computer systems were compromised by CCP approved hackers, just as the Holy See entered into talks with the Chinese government. At that time an analyst said:

“The saying knowledge is power is prevalent here, as nation-states infiltrate organizations via phishing or other vulnerabilities into their network. Once inside, they’re performing reconnaissance to find out if the information is worthwhile to their cause.

So if you know your system has already been infiltrated by Commie hackers at least once, why would you use volunteer workers to try and keep your “sprawling” (read: inefficient and vulnerable) computer systems safe?

Strange priorities at the Vatican: when Our Lady asks for the Pope to consecrate Russia and release the Third Secret by 1960, the Curia goes to great lengths to hide the facts. But when it’s a case of Vatican websites, databases or employee records, those are made available to every basement-dwelling cyber-terrorist on the globe.

Diabolical disorientation at its finest.

Two more thoughts: what other sensitive information is currently at the mercy of hackers? Files on suspected (and often innocent) priests? Details of secret and not-so-secret meetings, diplomatic missions and so on? Files on traditionalist bishops, priests, and parishes, just crying out for some scandals to be invented?

And all of the Vatican’s financial records and funds, no doubt. There’s no shortage of blackmailable agents within the Eternal City who would like to keep that a secret.

Also, could this be something to do with the coming global cyber attack about which Klaus Schwab has been warning us? We know it’s on the way because the Overlords have run a simulation on it. And it would be pretty helpful to them if the Vatican was to tell the world’s Catholics to sign up to the next stage of their Beast system.

So there may be a method to their madness, after all. In the meantime, if you’re an unemployed cyber-terrorist, or just a garden variety high-school hacker, why not sign up for the Vatican’s Cyber Volunteer program? As they say: the fringe-benefits are out of this world!

The Vatican, Epstein and Maxwell

Published on by Kathy Clubb4 Comments

In 2021, Pope Francis launched a joint venture between the Vatican and some wealthy technocrats known as the Council for Inclusive Capitalism. Heading up this synarchists’ dream is the uber-globalist, Lynn Forester de Rothschild, wife of Sir Evelyn de Rothschild of, well, Rothschild fame.

Forester de Rothschild’s Coalition for Inclusive Capital is funded by, among others, the Rockefeller and Ford Foundations – two influential proponents of population control and other nefarious agendas. (An interesting side note for Australian readers: one of the so-called “Guardians” of the Coalition is Sharan Burrow – a WEF associate and General Secretary of the International Trade Union Conference.)

De Rothschild also has links with the Clintons – and with Jeffrey Epstein. Prior to her marriage, Ms Forester had close ties with the Democrat party, and was a major fundraiser for Hillary Clinton’s Presidential campaign. Forester also worked for President Bill Clinton, on his National Information Infrastructure Advisory Committee and on his Secretary of Energy Advisory Board. In 1995, she wrote to the former president, mentioning Epstein.

‘Dear Mr. President: It was a pleasure to see you recently at Senator Kennedy’s house.

‘There was too much to discuss and too little time. Using my fifteen seconds of access to discuss Jeffrey Epstein and currency stabilization, I neglected to talk to you about a topic near and dear to my heart. Namely, affirmative action and the future’.

Lynn Forester to Bill Clinton, 1995

But that isn’t the end of Forester’s ties to Epstein: in 2000, Forester sold her Manhattan apartment to an anonymous corporation (this turned out to be the Terra Mar Project – *see below ) which was housed at the same address as Epstein’s New York office. It was quite the bargain at more than USD $8 million below market value and became the home of Ghislaine Maxwell until 2016.

Forester is said to have been close friends with Epstein, and is often credited with having introduced him to Bill Clinton. She was once a member of the McCain Institute (like many similarly incriminating records, the offending page has been scrubbed). One goal of the McCain Institute is to combat human sex-trafficking, but the organisation perversely, has many ties to Epstein and has apparently never exposed his crimes, even though its founder publicly acknowledged his guilt.

*Terra Mar was founded by Maxwell in 2012, and closed abruptly in 2019, just weeks after the arrest of Jeffrey Epstein. For more about Terra Mar and its potential links with child-trafficking, see here. And check out this video in which a UN spokesman says of Maxwell, “She controls the oceans…”. Incidentally, the TerraMar Project Youtube channel features a couple of videos lauding Pope Francis and his commitment to caring for our natural home, eg here and here.

There’s much, much more to learn about this highly-connected globalist, Lynn Forester de Rothschild, including the number of times her name pops up on the flight logs with or related to Epstein. Looks like Pope Francis didn’t do his homework on this one – or more likely – he just doesn’t care, protected, as he seems to be, by the most powerful technocrats of the day.

Anyway, all those rabbit holes make the “reptile people” seem like a welcome diversion.

So I’ll end on a slightly different note: Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein visiting the Vatican in 2003. They apparently met with Pope John Paul II, having flown in by private jet for a blessing. Video footage from a 2005 police raid of Epstein’s home shows the photograph among a group, arranged, most likely, to impress Epstein’s unsuspecting victims.

I can imagine the conversation:

“Buy the rights to this picture pronto, Ghislaine – I’ve got a feeling it will come in useful one day.”

“Er, Jeff, where you’re going to end up, not even the Pope can save you.”

Gotta love those watermarks – looks like The Sun wants full credit for the image. Sorry Jeff.

NOTE: credit goes to @JesseMatchey on Twitter for sharing much of this information.

Commandments for the Age of Aquarius

Published on by Kathy Clubb1 Comment

“New Commandments for a New Age” – it’s a craze that is sweeping the post-tradition landscape and everyone from the Technocrats to the Pope is coming up with their own novel rules for life.

In this article, I reported on the Pope’s “Nine Commandments” as presented to the World Movement of Populist Movements; they are suspiciously reminiscent of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals:

  • Pharmaceutical companies should make patents for COVID “vaccines” freely available (SDG #3)
  • International credit institutions should cancel debt. (SDG #1 and #10)
  • Big resource corporations should stop polluting and stop destroying habitats. (SDG #7, 9, 13)
  • Food corporations should end monopolies and provide inexpensive food. (SDG #2)
  • Powerful nations should rely on global entities such as the UN for mediating conflict. (SDG #17)
  • Big tech corporations should censor “hate speech, fake news and conspiracy theories.” (SDG #11)
  • Arms manufacturers and dealers should completely stop arms production. (SDG #16)
  • Media corporations should provide digital education for the poor. (SDG #4)
  • The media should report in a moral fashion and protect those who are “most damaged.” (SDG #5)

But isn’t only Pope Francis who feels compelled to create a new set of Commandments to suit his Modernist agenda; the idea has been around in globalist circles for decades. Take the Earth Charter group for example. This was the brainchild of, among others, former Soviet chief Mikhail Gorbachev: a text of sixteen “commandments” was released in 1997 after years of discussion about how the world was to “develop sustainably.” Some influential names among the creators of the charter will no doubt be familiar to readers of this site, eg Steven Rockefeller and the Jesuit Liberation theologian Leonardo Boff.

Incidentally, the 1992 Rio Summit, which laid the groundwork for the Earth Charter “commandments”, led to the development of another set of modern-day “commandments” – the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals. As mentioned above, Pope Francis’ new “commandments’ bear an uncanny resemblance to the SDG’s.

In 2001, the creators of the Earth Charter “commandments” went a step further and commissioned a sacrilegious version of the Ark of the Covenant, called the Ark of Hope. This humanist Ark was designed to hold the Earth Charter as well as something called the Temenos books, which are “a collection of prayers and affirmations for Earth.” Presumedly, the Temenos books are the equivalent of Sacred Scripture for the adherents of Gaia worship.

The Ark of Hope arriving in New York City in 2002.

Of special interest to those of us in Australia is the 2005 endorsement of the Earth Charter by the Federal government. At the time, the Senate stated that it:

  • Recognizes and supports the Earth Charter as an important civil society contribution to our understanding of sustainable development and the ethics and principles needed to promote a more just, sustainable and peaceful world;
  • Encourages the use of the Earth Charter by Federal and state educational authorities during the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development.

There has been no such endorsement of the Decalogue, however, with the government still struggling to present legislation that would provide consistent protections for religious freedom.

One of the most worrying aspects of all of these new codes of “ethics” is their focus on depopulation. The UN’s Sustainable Development Goals may not specifically mention a population target but their focus on “universal access to sexual and reproductive health” is a well-known code for “kill all the babies.”

One wonders how seriously the Australian government intends to take the Earth Charter’s commitment to zero population growth and by what means that would be achieved.

The idea of rewriting God’s Commandments seems to have been a popular one around the turn of last century. In 1999, Klaus Schwab told Forbes magazine that he wanted to educate the world with a new set of ten commandments – “ethical guidelines that would guide everyone in getting along.”

Researchers at the World Economic Forum revisited the topic in 2017, when, ignoring the fact that the Decalogue came straight from the hands of God, they remarked that man has always attempted to create his own code of ethics. The writers opine that these “man-made” codes always have internal inconsistencies and suggest that the world needs a “new code of ethics for a Brave New World.”

Of course, their dream is to see an internationally binding set of rules: it seems lost on them that you can’t get more global than the Commandments set down by the Creator of all mankind.

No survey of secular Commandments would be complete without a look at the intriguing and highly disturbing Georgia Guidestones. These were erected in Georgia, USA, in 1979 and echo the environmentally-friendly sentiments of the globalists.

1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
2. Guide reproduction wisely – improving fitness and diversity.
3. Unite humanity with a living new language.
4. Rule passion – faith – tradition – and all things with tempered reason.
5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
8. Balance personal rights with social duties.
9. Prize truth – beauty – love – seeking harmony with the infinite.
10. Be not a cancer on the earth – Leave room for nature – Leave room for nature.

The site where they stand has become a popular haunt (pun intended) of occultists; the Stones’ commandments were even given a hearty endorsement by Yoko Ono, wife of the late John Lennon, of Imagine fame.

So what are we to make of all these attempts at rewriting God’s Commandments? Not much, except to say that it is a sign of the times; references to the Imago Dei are notably absent in all of the Modern “commandments.”

According to the globalist doctrine, man is reduced to a mere economic factor in the totalitarian formula of stakeholder capitalism. And it should come as no surprise to faithful Catholics to see the current Vicar of Globalism at the forefront of those efforts to concoct New Commandments for the New World Order.

Marquis de la Franquerie on Synarchy- Part II

Published on by Kathy ClubbLeave a comment

PART 1 CAN BE FOUND HERE:

In another Instruction: “let’s flatter all the passions, the worst just as much as the most high-minded…”

“It is necessary to make the immoral education of the Church and (they always come back to it) get to the triumph of the revolution by a Pope….giving a step to everything that aspires to move … adroitly slide the spirits of our dogmas into the spirits (on this point again the directives repeat it over and over again) that priests and lay people persuade that Christianity is essentially a democratic doctrine.”

On August 9, 1839, Vindice wrote to Nubius to tell him that he blamed the individual murders of which the Carbonari and he adds with odious cynicism:

“We must not individualise vice; in order for it to grow to the proportions of patriotism and hatred of the Church, we must generalize it. Catholicism is no more afraid of a sharp dagger than the monarchy is, but these two foundations of the social order are likely to collapse through corruption; we at all events never allow ourselves to be corrupted. Do not, then, let us make martyrs but let us popularise vice among the masses. Whatever their five senses strive after shall be satisfied. Create hearts full of vice and you will have no more Catholics. That is the corruption on a large scale that we have undertaken, the corruption of the people by the people and the clergy by us, the corruption that leads the way to our digging the Church’s grave.”

What result did the Occult Power achieve? Nubius, on April 3, 1824, two months after having taken the supreme direction of the Alta Vendita, writes: “There is a certain part of the clergy which bites at the hook of our doctrines with a marvelous vivacity, in particular in Rome”.

And on April 3, 1843, he always returns to the question he considers crucial: “We must arrive by small, well-graduated means, at the triumph of the revolution by a Pope.” 

In 1845, another head of the Alta Vendita wrote about Father Gioberti and his work:

“Gioberti priest speaks to priests their language, and I will tell you that we are learning from all sides that in ranks of the secular and regular clergy, the doctrines of freedom and the Pope at the head of this freedom and independence Italian are a thought that appeals to many; so much that they are able to persuade many that Catholicism is essentially a Democratic doctrine; this party grows every day more among the clergy. We are impatiently awaiting Gioberti’s new work, this work is for priests … “

On the one hand, the leaders of the anti-Christian conspiracy congratulate themselves on the success of their abominable maneuvers, the other the Secretary of State of the Holy See, Cardinal Bernetti, exposes his fears and his painful anguish in a letter of August 4, 1845:

“Our young clergy is imbued with liberal doctrines … Serious studies are abandoned … The part of the clergy which, after us, naturally comes into business … is a thousand times more tainted with liberal vice …; most of them do not know anything about the character or the things of this time and they indulge in suggestions which will obviously give rise to great crises for the Church. (Everywhere) the same spirit of discord is blowing over the clergy …

past to become new men. The spirit of sect replaces love of neighbor; individual pride

grows in the shadows … “

It is useful to give some additional details on this Luciferian plan that we can now see almost completely realized. Stanislas de Guaita wants to:

“Revealing to theology the esoteric magnificence of which it is full, but without it understanding”

(Stanislas de Guaita, Essay of Cursed Sciences, I, p. 159).

The ex-canon Roca answers him:

“My beloved brother in Jesus Christ I do not deny any of the principles of your teaching which is mine. We agree on all points of esoteric doctrine, which is, he writes to Papus (Gérard Encausse), the true initiation, the one Christ made to the twelve and then to the seventy-two.”1

Brother Marsaudon:

“There is no problem to be solved with the Protestant churches, any more than there is between Masonry and the Synagogue, the difficulties only exist with the Roman Church ”

(F. Marsaudon, Le Temple, Sept.-Oct. 1946, p. 34).

He wrote this in 1946. He would certainly not write it nowadays since too many Catholic religious authorities have denied and rejected all the past and the doctrine of the Church …

Roca announces liturgical anarchy, in the name of a return to primitive Christianity:

“I believe that the divine cult in the form directed by the liturgy, ceremonial, ritual and regulations of the Roman Church will shortly undergo a transformation at an ecumenical council, which will restore to it the venerable simplicity of the apostolic golden age in accordance with the dictates of conscience and modern civilisation.” ”(Roca, Abbot Gabriel and his fiancée).

And he continues:

“There is a sacrifice in the offing which represents a solemn act of expiation …. The Papacy will fall; it will die under the hallowed knife which the fathers of the last council will forge. The papal Caesar is a Host crowned for sacrifice.”(Roca, Glorious Centenary).

He announces that the reign of the Thomistic theology is coming to an end, because:

“Mystical theology will be succeeded by scientific theology which the mature nations are crying out for.” (Roca, End of the Old World, pp. 525-538-492) and that Saint Thomas himself, if he returned to earth, would hasten to burn his theological sum and to replace it by the scientific sum.””(Roca, Glorieux Centenaire, p. 113).

He advises :

“A new, sublime, broad, deep, truly universalist Christianity, absolutely versatile … a universal worship in which all cults will be encompassed…” (Glorious Centenary, pp. 77) and “…the god will be humanity which, in my eyes, is membership with Christ,  which is therefore also the whole universe.”(p. 528). Also, “…the suffering Christ-Man, is succeeded in our days by the triumphant Christ-Spirit.” (p. 525).

“It is only in a theocratic society having the character of Freemasonry that we will one day be able to reunite Islam and Christendom, Jews and Buddhists, Europe and Asia in the same ideal and intense hope. It is, in a nutshell, up to Freemasonry to form the universal church.” (Pignatelle, Batailles Maçonniques, p. 29).

And the Bulletin du Grand Orient declares:

“Masonry wants to be the super-church, the church that will unite them all.”(n ° 37, Politics and Masonry). Roca adds:

“What Christianity wants to build … is a universal worship in which all cults will be encompassed.” (Glorieux Centenaire, p. 77).

And the Masonic review, Le Symbolisme, writes in turn:

“We aspire to act as an intermediary between us and God. It is therefore likely that the religion of the future will make each faithful his own priest …. If so, initiation will become the great religious school and symbolism will help thinkers to discover the truth that hides in the depths of the human spirit ”(Le Symbolisme, February 1959).

Brother Riandey, specifies:

“The future world will create something new after having assimilated Christianity and other forms of spirituality and will perhaps give birth, by analogy with the physical phenomenon of total collectivization, to a kind of pantheism in which all current thoughts will be melted, amalgamated, all re-energized together towards still inconceivable objectives ”(Le Temple, Sept.-Oct. 1946).

Roca announces:

“There will be a new religion; there will be a new dogma; there will be ritual; there will be a new priesthood whose relationship with the falling Church will be exactly what the relationship of the Catholic Church was with the Mosaic Church, her late mother ”(End of the Old World, p. 373).

“Faith disappears before science which must illuminate everything … We will not stop the movement; science is the queen of the world, because it is God himself, in humanity.” (Glorieux Centenaire, pp. 21 and 79).

“The duty of everyone at this hour is to promote the evolution that the Papacy must make in order to put itself in harmony with the new Spirit of the World and the rational sciences.” (End of the Old World, p.130).

The World Spiritualist Congress declared in Brussels in 1946:

“There exists above the various religions a universal church composed of all dogmatically free believers who unite their convictions relating to the existence of a Supreme Being, to a future life, to the immortality of the soul as well as the duty of human love proclaimed as the first of all by churches and religions. ”

What then becomes of Heaven? Roca replies:

“The impersonal and divine reign of Truth in Liberty, of Justice in Equality, of the Social Economy in Fraternity, which is the sacred trinomial of evangelical synarchy ”(Glorieux Centenaire, p. 20.)

In The End of the Old World (p. 36), Roca continues:

“The religious, political and social Redeemer will reign over Humanity through impersonal institutions”.

Hence the establishment of democracy in the political field, public limited companies in the economic field, unions in the social field and in the religious field, the Collegiality of Bishops, which makes them serve as anonymous and all-powerful committees, which bind them and prevent them from acting with the legitimate authority that is proper as successors of the Apostles. This Collegiality, of which one could say that the first manifestation, on Good Friday, was the panicked fear of the Apostles who fled and dispersed while their chief, saint

Peter, denied the Master three times. In short, the reign of Lucifer.

And Roca announced the “conversion” of a pope to the new spirit of the world after the Ecumenical Council – which he had also announced – and which would have brought the Church back to the simplicity of the apostolic golden age:

“The old Papacy will break the silence at the hour when the entirely evangelical work of this glorious palingenesis (rebirth) will be completed. Then, turning around in his sepulcher, Peter will verify the oracle of Christ. He ‘will confirm his brothers’, that is to say all Christian peoples in the new ways into which their Redeemer made them enter before him. He will dedicate modern civilisation; he will proclaim her the daughter of the Church, heir to the Sunday promises and the true spirit of the parables.

“Pronouncing its own downfall, the Roman papacy will declare Urbi et Orbi that having completed its mission and its role of initiator, it dissolves in its old form, to leave the field open to the higher operations of the new Pontificate of the New Church and of the new Priesthood that he will canonically install himself before exhaling the last breath … “

“As soon as it becomes visible to all that the new order logically emerges from the old order … the old woman, the papacy and the old priesthood will abdicate willingly before the pontificate and before the priests of the future2 who will be those of the past, converted and transfigured, with a view to the organization of the Planet in the light of the Gospel.

“And this new church, although it might not be able to keep anything of Scholastic doctrine and the original form of the former Church, will nevertheless receive consecration and canon jurisdiction from Rome. 

“It is necessary that the release takes place and that the Law of evolution resumes its divine course in the cycle opened by the Holy Gospel in the footsteps of the new Humanity. The Synarchy is suitable to operate this general revolution.” (Glorieux Centenaire, pp. 462 to 469).

And the Pope he wants at the head of the Ecumenical Council is: “Not a Pontiff of faith or of pistis (?) but a Pontiff of Gnosis or of esoteric science.” (Le Socialisme Chrétien, July 5, 1891). And Roca continues

“Something will emerge that will make the world amazing and throw the world on its knees before its Redeemer. This thing will be the demonstration of the perfect agreement between the ideal of modern civilization and the ideal of Christ and His Gospel. This will be the consecration of the New Social Order and the solemn Baptism of modern civilization.” (End of the Old World, p. 282).

“The Vatican convert will not, according to Christ, have to reveal a new teaching to his brothers. He will not have not to push Christendom or the full world towards paths other than the paths followed by the peoples under the Secret inspiration of the Spirit, but simply to confirm them in this modern civilization. The Pontiff will be content to confirm and glorify the work of the Spirit of Christ or of the Christ-Spirit in the public mind and, thanks to the privilege of his personal infallibility, he will canonically declare Urbi et Orbi that contemporary civilization is the legitimate daughter of the holy gospel of social redemption.” (Glorieux Centenaire, p. 111).

Now, this is the peril; some – and not the least – would like to extend the Pontifical Infallibility to all acts of the Pope. On June 29, 1970, was the following statement not heard in the Vatican?

“The relationship of the faithful with Christ has in Peter his minister, his interpreter, his guarantor. All must obey what he orders, if they want to be associated with the new economy of the Gospel.” (Abbot Rayssignier, Open Letter to the Pope, dated June 30, 1970). {{I am unable to find any information on Fr Rayssignier}}

Which is a formal heresy, in absolute opposition to the definition of the 1st Vatican Council. Roca took care to declare at the International Spiritualist Congress held in the Grand-Orient of France, in September 1889: “My Christ is not that of the Vatican.” (Papus, The Veil of ISIS, n ° 130, 1893).

We suspected it a little; it’s Lucifer’s, it’s Lucifer himself! He does not hide it since he had declared elsewhere that the Christ-Man is that of the Kabbalah. (End of the Old World, p. 12.). Now, the eighteenth dogma of the Kabbalah proclaims: “Demon is deus universus.” (The Demon is the universal god.)

And he concludes:

“I affirm that we are approaching the final closure of the old religious, political and economic order, and I announce the forthcoming opening of an absolutely new cycle from all points of view, in the Church, in the State , in the family, in all circles of human activity. ”(Glorieux Centenaire, p. 13).

READ PART 1 HERE

FOOTNOTES:

  1. He also alludes to the alleged secret teachings of Our Lord … as quoted by P. Virion, Mystère d’Iniquité, p.20.
  2. Roca designates the new priests under the name of “Progressives” (Glorious Centenary, p. 447) and advocates the suppression of the soutane (Christ, the Pope and Democracy, pp. 105-107) as well as the marriage of priests (Id., P. 103) and in a novel written for this purpose, L’Abbé Gabriel et sa fiancée. He also announces the unions of priests.z (Glorious Centenary, p. 452).

Marquis de la Franquerie on Synarchy: Part 1

Published on by Kathy ClubbLeave a comment

taken from Pontifical Infallibility, the Syllabus, the Condemnation of Modernism and the Current Crisis of the Church

CHAPTER IV – THE PLOT OF THE COUNTER-CHURCH

“We will penetrate to the very heart of this Pontifical Court from which nothing in the world will be able to chase us, until we have destroyed the power of the Pope. ”

17th Session of the Zionist Congress in Basel, 1897

Thus, God had given to the world – in addition to His grace, which never fails – the light enabling it to ensure its salvation. Under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, successively Pius VI, in his Allocution on the Martyrdom of Louis XVI; Gregory XVI, in all his teachings; Pius IX, in the Encyclical, Quanta Cura, followed by the first Syllabus; Leo XIII, in his admirable Encyclicals and in particular in Humanum Genus; Saint Pius X, in the Encyclical Pascendi, followed by the second Syllabus and in the Condemnation of “Sillon”; Pius XI, in his Encyclicals Divini Redemptoris on the inherently perverse communism and in Mit Brennender Sorge on Nazism; Pius XII, of holy memory, in the Encyclical Humani Generis and in its luminous Instructions of 31 May and 2 November 1954 to all the bishops of the world, had shown the peril and indicated the remedies.

Confirming the Pontifical Teachings, eminent prelates, such as Our Lords Delassus, Meurin and Jouin, of courageous and lucid historians like Léon de Poncins, Pierre Virion and Maurice Pinay, have proved the reality of the Luciferian Plan of domination of the Counter-Church over the world, that, for their part, the henchmen of Satan – because they considered themselves already as victorious – no longer feared to reveal little by little in their declarations and their writings1 – such as Stanislas de Guaïta, the ex-abbot Roca, Saint-Yves d’Alveydre, etc … and the Synarchy. All of this is confirmed by the “Protocols of the Sages of Zion ”, stolen at the end of the last century.2

Because we did not want to follow the Pontifical Teachings or believe the theologians and historians who denounced danger, the Church is currently going through the most serious crisis in its history.

To understand the causes, it is necessary to recall the plan of the Luciferian Occult Power and the Instructions and secrets of the Sects that fell into the hands of the Holy See and that Pius IX had published by Crétineau-Joly.3

Already, in the 18th Century, the chief of the Illuminati, the Jew Weishaup writes:

“Freemasons must exercise empire over men of all states, of all nations, of all religions, to dominate them without any external constraint, to keep them united by lasting bonds, to inspire them all with the same spirit, breathe the same spirit everywhere, in the greatest silence and with all possible activity, direct all men on earth for the same purpose. It is in the privacy of Secret Societies that you must know how to influence opinion.”4

Maurice Talmeyr, in his pamphlet How we Form Opinion, describes the maneuver and its terrible effectiveness: 

“When men are ostensibly from a sect or from a school, when they recognize themselves to be one, “opinion” is warned against their esprit de corps, it is on guard. But men whom nothing shows are united between them, who do not themselves know if they are, but who think and judge the same about everything, these men achieve precisely what it is a question of achieving, that is, a consensus. An artificial consensus, a manufactured consensus, but which seems spontaneous and which impresses strongly.”

Weishaupt gives the slogan: make Christians believe that it is Our Lord Jesus Christ who was the great inventor of the Masonic trinomial: Freedom, Equality, Fraternity – that it was the very doctrine taught by Him, understood of course in the sense of the Sects.

“Our Doctrine,” he said, “is that divine doctrine as Jesus Christ taught His disciples, that which He gave them but developed the true meaning in his secret speeches5 … He taught all mankind how to come to the delivery … No one has opened up to freedom such sure paths as our Great Jesus of Nazareth … “

From Florence, on August 5, 1806, Simonini exposed to Abbé Barruel the Plan of the Occult Power, which one of his high dignitaries entrusted to him; the Abbot immediately communicated it to Pope Pius VII, who replied that he believed in its authenticity. Let us quote some main passages:

“ #4  That in our Italy alone, they had as supporters more than eight hundred ecclesiastics, both secular and regular, among whom many parish priests, public professors, prelates, a few bishops and a few cardinals, whom they did not did not despair of soon having a pope from their party;

“ #5  That similarly in Spain, they had a large number of partisans even among the clergy …

” #6 That the Bourbon Family was the greatest enemy, that in a few years they hoped to annihilate it …”

Shortly afterwards, the Heads of Haute-Vente (This appears to refer to the Alta Vendita) were to resume the fight with the same methods by inculcating in Christians that “Christianism is an essentially democratic doctrine” and by seducing them by equalitarianism and humanitarianism. A standing secret instruction, dated 1819, states:

“There is a thought that has always preoccupied men who aspire to universal regeneration: it is thought of the liberation (?) of Italy, from which must leave, on a determined day, the liberation (?) of the entire world: the fraternal republic and the harmony of humanity. But there is an obstacle, it is the Church, and this obstacle is formidable.”

“Our final goal is that of Voltaire and that of the French Revolution, the annihilation of everything from Catholicism and even from the Christian idea…”

Then, the directives are given: to speak “without end on the dangers of fanaticism, on the happiness of social equality and on the great principles of religious freedom, against intolerance and persecution” and they conclude: “The law of social progress is here and all here; don’t bother to look elsewhere … “

And even :

“What we must ask above all, what we must seek and expect, as the Jews await the Messiah, is a Pope according to our needs…and with this, to break the rock on which God built His Church, we have the little finger of the successor of Peter engaged in the plot, and this little finger is valid for this crusade all Urban IIs and all Saint Bernard of Christendom ”.

“We have no doubts about reaching this supreme end of our efforts, but how? The unknown does not emerge Again. Nevertheless, as nothing should differ us from the tracked plan, on the contrary, everything must tend toward it…, we want to give the Supreme Selling agents some advice … “

These tips are truly Luciferian:

“Crush the enemy whoever he may be; crush the powerful by means of lies and calumnies; but especially crush him in the egg. It is to the youth we must go, it is that which we must seduce; it is that which we must bring under the banner of the secret societies. In order to advance by steps, calculated but sure, in that perilous way, two things are of the first necessity. You ought have the air of being simple as doves, but you must be prudent as the serpent. Your fathers, your children, your wives themselves, ought always be ignorant of the secret which you carry in your bosoms. If it pleases you, in order the better to deceive the inquisitorial eye, to go often to confession, you are, as by right authorised, to preserve the most absolute silence regarding these things. You know that the least revelation, that the slightest indication escaped from you in the tribunal of penance, or elsewhere, can bring on great calamities, and that the sentence of death is already pronounced upon the revealer, whether voluntary or involuntary.

“Now then, in order to secure to us a Pope in the manner required, it is necessary to fashion for that Pope a generation worthy of the reign of which we dream. Leave on one side old age and middle life, go to the youth, and, if possible, even to infancy. Never speak in their presence a word of impiety or impurity, Maxima debetur puero reverentia. Never forget these words of the poet for they will preserve you from licences which it is absolutely essential to guard against for the good of the cause. In order to reap profit at the home of each family, in order to give yourself the right of asylum at the domestic hearth, you ought to present yourself with all the appearance of a man grave and moral. Once your reputation is established in the colleges, in the gymnasiums, in the universities, and in the seminaries-once that you shall have captivated the confidence of professors and students, so act that those who are principally engaged in the ecclesiastical state should love to seek your conversation…..

“That reputation will open the way for our doctrines to pass to the bosoms of the young clergy, and go even to the depths of convents. In a few years the young clergy will have, by the force of events, invaded all the functions. They will govern, administer, and judge. They will form the council of the Sovereign. They will be called upon to choose the Pontiff who will reign; and that Pontiff, like the greater part of his contemporaries, will be necessarily imbued with the Italian and humanitarian principles which we are about to put in circulation. It is a little grain of mustard which we place in the earth, but the sun of justice will develop it even to be a great power; and you will see one day what a rich harvest that little seed will produce …

“Seek out the Pope of whom we give the portrait. You wish to establish the reign of the elect upon the throne of the prostitute of Babylon? Let the clergy march under your banner in the belief always that they march under the banner of the Apostolic Keys. You wish to cause the last vestige of tyranny and of oppression to disappear? Lay your nets like Simon Barjona. Lay them in the depths of sacristies, seminaries, and convents, rather than in the depths of the sea, and if you will precipitate nothing you will give yourself a draught of fishes more miraculous than his. The fisher of fishes will become a fisher of men. You will bring your-selves as friends around the Apostolic Chair. You will have fished up a Revolution in Tiara and Cope, marching with Cross and banner-a Revolution which it will need but to be spurred on a little to put the four quarters of the world on fire.”

The full text, in French, can be found here:

Footnotes: (as found in original)

  1. One may wonder whether the following facts do not fall within the scope of the calculated revelations: the July / September 1969 issue of Charivari: “Sects and Secret Societies in France today”, coinciding with the launch of the film: “The Virgins of Satan” – white magic against black magic – coming after the discovery – unwanted this one – of the dossier of Jamaa, which touches on the question of Luciferian relations with men through incubi and succubi … Etc … As well as certain publications from Lafont (collection with black covers and gold titles), of ” I read it ”, of the “Pocket Book”, and also the publications “Nostradamus” and “Le Grand Albert”, etc …
  2. Obviously, the Occult Power would not have made the mistake of making known such a document, which should remain secret. Faced with this unexpected revelation, he tried everything to make the Catholics themselves deny its authenticity …Our Lord recently confirmed its authenticity in his revelations to the nun of Mexico.
  3. All the following quotes concerning Haute-Vente are taken from his work, L’Eglise Romaine en face de the revolution. See also our brochure, The Judeo-Masonic Plan against the Church, published in 1927.
  4. Original writings of the Order and the Sect of the Illuminated, 1787, Munich by the printer of the Court, quoted by BARRUEL in his Memoirs to serve the history of Jacobinism (New edition in 1974. Diffusion de la Pensée Française Editors). In the citations of the documents that follow, it is we who have put the most important passages in Roman characters.
  5.  You have heard of Our Lord’s “secret speeches”. This is how these people write history!

Synarchy: missing link to the New World Order’s rise

Published on by Kathy ClubbLeave a comment

Dr Rudolf Graber, Bishop of Regensburg from 1962 to 1981, revolutionised my understanding of the New World Order and the Church’s part in its establishment. Like many Catholics who acknowledge the role of Masonry in society’s destabilisation, there seemed to be a disconnect between modern feel-good Freemasonry and the historical, militant secret societies that plotted revolutions and the destruction of the Holy Catholic Church.

It did not sit well with me, as it does not sit well with many others, to dismiss modern Masonry as a harmless pursuit, a mere shadow of its former self, perhaps – or worse, as an organisation that never intended any harm at all.

It was Bishop Graber’s book, Athanasius and the Church of our Time ( a free copy, translated via online software is available here) that provided the clue I had been looking for, the missing link, if you will. His Excellency’s book introduced me to the concept of synarchy, and it is this particular offshoot of Masonry that led the world to its current state: that of a soft totalitarianism governed by unelected technocrats.

To be quite honest, I have only this moment finished reading the good Bishop’s book, although I was introduced to it years ago. While pursuing my research on the Conciliar Church’s Hermeneutic of Rupture, Athanasius and the Church of Our Time was cited in footnote after footnote of insightful, traditionalist books. In his very slim volume, Bishop Graber picks up all the threads and pulls them tightly into an intelligent argument, explaining how synarchy grew out of Masonry and other secret societies but always had the stated goal of “a centralized world state with a centralized government planned as an anti-Church.” This is obviously a little different from Masonry’s stated goal of destroying the Church, but here we can see the genesis of plans for an ape of the Church to be built on the hollowed-out edifice of Catholicism.

According to Bishop Graber, the ex-Canon Roca, an excommunicated priest who lived in the 19th century, and whose Masonic ideas are frequently quoted in exposés of the Church’s infiltration, was a devotee of the “divine synarchy.” Roca foresaw a revolution in the Catholic Church, sparked by an ecumenical council, with a “new” dogma”, “new” ritual, and a “new” priesthood.

This plan was also laid out in a 1907 book by the Abbé Melinge, writing under the pseudonym, Dr Alta. Alta gave five key items on an agenda to remake the Church in a diabolical image:

* the appeal to esotericism

* the revolt against the structures of the Church

* the replacement of the Roman papacy by a “pluri-confessional” pontificate able to adapt to a polyvalent ecumenism such as we are seeing established today in the inter-celebration of priests and Protestant pastors

* the glorification of Christ by a new humanity

* the inversion of all the truths taught by Christ.

from Athanasius and the Church of Our Time

It is quite easy to see, in fact, heartbreakingly so, how far the Masons and synarchists have progressed in their plan to create an anti-Church. Add the current threats to the Traditional Latin Mass to the already-witnessed idolatry and syncretism in the Vatican, “synodality,” inversion of truths such as Communion for adulterers and tolerance of homosexuality, and the “New Humanism” of the post-conciliar horizontal Church and it looks as though there is only a little way to go before the Church is unrecognisable. [Humanly speaking, that is. Of course, Jesus Himself was barely recognisable thanks to the tortures He received during His Passion.]

Of particular interest to me – and therefore, I assume, also to you, my dear readers – Bishop Graber also mentions an Italian novel written in 1905, in which some characters discuss the formation of a Catholic Freemasonry. The book was once on the Index and appears to be available only in the original language. In this book, the chief protagonist gathers together a select group of clergy and laity who want to see change in the Church but without an outright rebellion. The speaker recommends that this be achieved by introducing heretical ideas into the minds of the faithful, who will then pressure the hierarchy to implement the changes that they – the hierarchy – had wanted from the start. He also advised against any formal relations among members of this Catholic Freemasonry, to make it more difficult for them to be traced. Was this novel based in fact? I will leave that to you to decide. But just consider this: the heretical proponent of Catholic Masonry suggested that “ideas are stronger than men” and that it may take them fifty years to see their plans come to fruition. That was written in 1905 and fifty years later, the Council of Rupture was opened by John XXIII.

I plan to write more on the topic of synarchy as it has become obvious that this is integral to my book on Ecclesiastical Freemasonry.

In the meantime, please do avail yourself of a free version of Athanasius and the Church of Our Time.