Tag: Abortion

Pro-Abortion Nuns & Occult Artwork at Vatican

Abortion Advocates & Occult Artwork at Vatican

Published on by Kathy ClubbLeave a comment

It was bad enough that Papa Bergoglio would agree to meet with the Board of Directors of a pro-abortion NGO at the Vatican. The setting for the official photograph, however, takes this meeting to another level.

The Conrad N. Hilton Foundation is the largest funder of Catholic religious sisters around, has sent millions of dollars towards the formation and good works of Catholic sisters over the years. It also assists refugees, the poor and provides access to safe water – ostensibly one of its seven main goals. The Foundation also has an association with National Catholic Reporter which, due to its heterodox content, even US Bishops have claimed is ‘not really Catholic’.

That’s all well and good but the Hilton Foundation is also very pro-abortion. Among the many organisations the Foundation has helped financially are those dedicated to ‘reproductive health’ aka abortion and contraception, including the ‘California Latinas for Reproductive Justice.’ [see more here.]

California Latinas for Reproductive Justice

Pope Francis met with the Board of the Hilton Foundation on January 22 of this year. He of course told them how wonderful their work was, giving them some gems like “Compassion is not throwing money into the hands of another without looking them in the eyes.“ Right. Be like McCarrick who looked the Popes right in the eyes as he threw them bucketloads of money.

What really caught my eye was the strange artwork hanging in the background of the official photograph of the occasion, which was circulated by the Vatican’s press office. Although not as aesthetically offensive as other artwork favoured by the Curia (thinking here of Rupnik and Jago) this one certainly is strange when you take a close look at it. And the fact that it was chosen as the backdrop to the photograph of Francis taken with abortion advocates and feminist nuns like Nathalie Berquart makes it even more stunning.

“Abbraccio Cosmico” by Camilian Demetrescu

“Abbraccio Cosmico” (Cosmic Embrace) is a tapestry created by by Camilian Demetrescu. Demetrescu was a Freemason-turned-Moslem who associated with Modernists, nihilists and Theosophists. His tapestry was installed in 2008, during the pontificate of Benedict XVI.

Describing his work, Demetrescu claims that:

This tapestry has been made in Italy (Gallese) after the september 11th 2001 : the cosmic love (abbraccio cosmico) is the only response to such a tragedy. Two angels are moving the universe around the planets’ hug.

What he doesn’t explain is that this design is all about astrology, including cosmic portals and ‘as above, so below’ imagery as well as the fake New Age ‘angels’.

Below is one interpretation of the image that came from an occultist – not from the artist himself. [NOTE: This information came from a website called ‘Keys to Ascension’. I really don’t like linking directly to occult websites.]

The translation means “Cosmic Embrace.” The center of this painting is a man and woman1 in a tender embrace. This represents the Sacred Union of the Divine Feminine and Divine Masculine. Uniting the Heart and the Mind through Divine Cosmic Love – Christ Love!

Facing the picture, the Blue Angel on the left represents the Feminine/Universe/ Spirit. The Brown Angel on the right represents Masculine/Earth/Physicality. The Angels wings are pointing up and down. They are each holding a handle. One up – one down. As Above – So Below. The handles are connected to a shaft of Light that runs through the heart center of the Divine Cosmic Embrace. The EnLightened Ones are guiding the transition.

Notice also that the handle held by the Earth Angel is attached to a spiral – a Cosmic Portal. The handle held by the Cosmic Angel is attached to a symbol of the Cardinal Grand Cross2. Earth/Humanity goes through the Cosmic Portal to connect to the heart of Divine Source/Divine Unconditional Love – the Cosmic Embrace. The Cosmic Alignment funnels Light through Divine Source/Divine Unconditional Love to elevate Earth.

The Cosmic Portal envelopes the planets and humanity in a Divine embrace of Christ Consciousness. This is the birth of the New Age of EnLightenment!

  1. Another interpreation explains that the two people embracing are ‘asexual.’ ↩︎
  2. An astronomical formation which is highly significant in the practise of astrology. When a Cardinal Grand Cross occurs in the heavens, it is a ‘sacred day’ to many occultists. ↩︎
The Pope, the Abortionist and the Convert.

The Pope, the Abortionist and the Convert

Published on by Kathy ClubbLeave a comment

Emma Bonino is an Italian, a former politician and abortionist, who is on good terms with Pope Francis and who was apparently friendly with JPII as well..

A fascinating report comes from Gloria TV (or here on his own blog, in Italian) where the author, Danilo Quinto, was once a personal friend of the notorious Ms. Emma Bonino. After experiencing a conversion, he now writes to expose the rot inside and outside the Church. God bless him.

The author is a former and repented high-placed activist of the immoral and inhuman Italian Partito Radicale which works for the de-Christianisation of Italy. On 5 November Bergoglio paid a visit to Emma Bonino, a former leader of that party. Bergoglio called Bonino a ‘great Italian’ (sic) and example of ‘liberty and resilience’ (sic).

I too frequented that terrace in Trastevere, in the centre of Rome.

Those were the years when strategies were being imagined and constructed to consolidate the results of the divorce and abortion laws, which destroyed the family institution.

A ‘demographic bomb’ was denounced, which never existed, but served to decertify an entire country and prevent, with the spread of the pill and other contraceptive systems, its growth, which is only determined by the birth of new creatures into the world.

The foundations for the campaign on euthanasia were laid, which over the years, despite the lack of a law, has become a widespread and customary practice, along with assisted suicide.

We discussed how to permanently overthrow the temporal power of the Church; the theory of the third and fourth sex, same-sex marriage, assisted fertilisation, and surrogate motherhood were being spread.

Consciences were manipulated to the acceptance and integration of people who sooner or later – after replacing us – will kill us all.

Well, on that terrace of that house that has seen literally every colour of the rainbow, the Head of the Catholic Church, the indestructible Jorge Maria Bergoglio, came up the other day.

He had a bouquet of white roses and a box of chocolates in his hand, to pay homage to the maximum exponent of that ideology – after the death of Pannella – that has contributed decisively to de-Christianising Italy and making churches useful for making large soup kitchens for the poor, for welcoming migrants or for making money by handing them over to private individuals, who manage them to make museums or other worldly stuff.

‘Example of freedom and resilience,’ Bergoglio said of Emma Bonino. He hit the nail on the head.

After all, from a man like him, who masterfully interprets the desires of this degenerate world, one could not expect the intention to convert Emma Bonino – he has declared several times that he does not want to convert anyone – but only a snapshot of reality.

Certainly, Emma Bonino is an example of ‘freedom and resilience’. Yes, from God! As is the one who uttered these words.

Both have done, and they will still do everything until their death – unless they convert, in their case publicly, given the gravity of their sins – to ensure that human beings are free from their Creator and will be resilient to His laws.

As have been those many Italian Catholics who have divorced, had abortions, used contraceptive methods, letting an ideology win that has nothing human about it.

As has been that modernist Church, a direct product of the secular work of Freemasonry and the Second Vatican Council, which has in Bergoglio its latest interpreter, after a succession of popes subsequent to Pius XII who paved the way for him and the Mafia of St. Gallen.

At the conclusion of the encyclical Etsi Multa of 21 November 1873, Pius IX uses an expression that appears twice in the Bible – Synagogue of Satan – in ch. 2 verse 9 and ch. 3 verse 9 of the Apocalypse of St John the Evangelist.

He writes: ‘It will perhaps surprise some of you, Venerable Brethren, that the war that is being waged against the Catholic Church today is expanding so much. But whoever knows the character, the aims and the purpose of the sects, whether they are called Masonic or by any other name, and compares them to the character, the manner, and the extent of this war, by which the Church is assailed on almost every side, will certainly not be able to doubt that this calamity is not to be attributed to the frauds and machinations of those sects. For from them is formed the synagogue of Satan, who orders his army against the Church of Christ, raises his banner and comes to battle’.

Prophetic words. Exemplary of the situation we live in, where men of the Church prostrate themselves to the World and the builders of Evil.

To counterbalance the attempts of those men of the Church and those builders of Evil – united by the design of the strong powers, who want to annihilate man, created in the image and likeness of God – the Church founded by Our Lord Jesus Christ, which is of divine origin, will not be brought down, despite the night of Gethsemane that it has been living through for too long, to the delight of its enemies.

As the beautiful antiphon at the introit of the Feast of Christ the King of the Apostolic Mass says:

‘The Lamb who was slain is worthy to receive power, riches, wisdom, strength, honour, glory and praise; on Him be Lordship forever’.

Here is Bonino again, dressed as a priest. This time in with US Secretary of State, John Kerry, when she was the Italian Foreign Minister in 2013.

Blackcat, CC BY-SA 3.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

John Paul II, Emma Bonino, Marco Pannella (Vatican City, 1986).jpg

U.S. Department of State from United States, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

The Hideous Context of Bergoglio’s ‘Pro Life’ Comments.

Published on by Kathy ClubbLeave a comment

Last week the Pope made his way back from a trip to Oceania and during an in-flight press conference, gave some comments that have been interpreted as bolstering his pro life credentials. However, the whole quote in context is genuinely disgraceful: the Pope equated the great crime of abortion, that sin which cries to heaven for vengeance with the wholly legitimate activity of ejecting illegal immigrants.

As reported by Vatican News, Pope Francis responded to a journalist’s questions about the upcoming US presidential election:

Anna Matranga (CBS News)

Your Holiness, you have always spoken in defence of the dignity of life. In Timor-Leste, which has a high birth rate, you said you felt life pulsing and exploding with so many children. In Singapore, you defended migrant workers. With the US elections coming up, what advice would you give a Catholic voter faced with a candidate who supports ending a pregnancy and another who wants to deport 11 million migrants?

Both are against life: the one that throws out migrants and the one that kills children. Both are against life. I can’t decide; I’m not American and won’t go to vote there. But let it be clear: denying migrants the ability to work and receive hospitality is a sin, a grave sin. The Old Testament speaks repeatedly of the orphan, the widow, and the stranger—migrants. These are the three that Israel must care for. Failing to care for migrants is a sin, a sin against life and humanity.

I celebrated Mass at the border, near the diocese of El Paso. There were many shoes from migrants, who ended poorly there. Today, there is a flow of migration within Central America, and many times they are treated like slaves because people take advantage of the situation. Migration is a right, and it was already present in Sacred Scripture and in the Old Testament. The stranger, the orphan, and the widow—do not forget this.

Obviously the primary error here is that the Pope is equating ILLEGAL immigration with LEGAL immigration. It is true that migration was common in Old Testament days and it is still common today: nations should gladly accept a sensible number of immigrants who commit to assimilating and contributing to the common good.

But when Moses took the Israelites to the Promised Land, they were doing the Will of God. They were bringing with them what was, at that time, the true religion, unlike today’s illegals who are anything from Marxist infiltrators to child sex traffickers to practitioners of Voodoo and Santeria. The Israelites weren’t given debit cards and free housing and we can be fairly sure they didn’t resort to eating the locals’ pets. So the Pope is creating a false equivalence here and ignoring the multiple ways mass illegal migration is tearing at the fabric of western societies.

Then, abortion. Science says that at one month after conception, all the organs of a human being are present. Everything. Having an abortion is killing a human being. Whether you like the word or not, it’s murder. The Church is not closed-minded because it forbids abortion; the Church forbids abortion because it kills. It is murder; it is murder!

And we need to be clear about this: sending migrants away, not allowing them to grow, not letting them have life is something wrong, it is cruelty. Sending a child away from the womb of the mother is murder because there is life. And we must speak clearly about these things. “No, but however…” No “but however.” Both things are clear. The orphan, the stranger, and the widow—do not forget this.

The first thing to note here is that, in mentioning two of the sins that cry to heaven – the cry of the ‘orphan, stranger and widow’ and abortion – the Pope omits two other very relevant ones: sodomy and the failure to pay a just wage. Both of these are widely known to be rampant with the Vatican’s walls under hhis pontificate.

Secondly, not content with saying imported thugs should be given the same treatment as genuine migrants in his first response, the Pope now says imported thugs as just as important as unborn babies.

So the tuberculosis-carrying murderers, rapists, and drug-pushers deserve the same protections as vulnerable babies in the womb? What a regrettable comment from a Successor of St. Peter who is basically saying that both actions are mortally sinful. (If he believes in mortal sin, which is doubtful.)

In your opinion, Your Holiness, are there circumstances in which it is morally permissible to vote for a candidate who is in favor of abortion?

In political morality, it is generally said that not voting is ugly, it’s not good. One must vote. And one must choose the lesser evil. Which is the lesser evil? That lady or that gentleman? I don’t know; each person must think and decide according to their own conscience.

Wrong again, Holy Father. While Catholics MAY deem it prudent to vote for the pro-abortionTrump under the current circumstances, they MAY NOT vote for a pro-abortion candidate of the magnitude of Kamala Harris under any circumstances. (Here is Fr. Ripperger’s opinion on voting for the lesser evil.) And there always remains an option to vote third party as matter of principle.

So what at first glance appears to be a strong defence of life, is in reality merely an excuse for the Pope to bang on about one of his his favourite causes: the mass migration that globalists are using as a tool to smash national identity.

This is yet another pawn being moved on the global chessboard to create a New World Order, with Pope Francis cheerfully playing his part. The Introit from today’s Mass in memory of the martyrs, Sts Cornelius and Cyprian seems particularly apt:

“…O God , the heathens are come into Thine inheritance; they have defiled Thy holy temple…” Psalm 78.

Critical Review of Francis Bergoglio’s autobiographical book

Published on by Kathy ClubbLeave a comment

This was sent to me by the secretary of the Bishops of the Byzantine Catholic Patriarchate, with a request that it be published on my site. Although I don’t share the view that we have the authority to denounce Bergoglio as pope, I nevertheless sympathise with those who place themselves outside the institutional church in these troubled times. That said, I am in agreement with many of the sentiments written below. NOTE that THe italicised commentary is part of the original document.


The media report that Bergoglio’s autobiographical book spanning over 300 pages is set to be released on 19 March 2024. In the book, Bergoglio mentions his resignation, stressing that in this respect it is “a distant hypothesis”, since he says there are “no serious reasons” for his resignation.
Commentary: As early as 2018, Bergoglio and his homo-network were publicly called upon to resign by C. M. Viganò, Nuncio Emeritus to the US, for very serious reasons. Moreover, the fact is that Bergoglio has already excommunicated himself from the Church owing to his pseudo-gospel (cf. Gal 1:8-9). He cannot therefore be its head, as Scripture, the Church Fathers, the Doctors of the Church and the dogmatic constitution confirm. Nevertheless, he continues to illegally occupy the papal office.


The pages of the autobiographical book also traverse the history of the Argentine dictatorship during General Jorge R. Videla’s regime. Bergoglio dwells on repeated accusations addressed to him of being complicit with the dictatorship, and therefore deliberately presents himself in his book as a saviour of vulnerable children and young people. However, a federal court in Argentina investigated Bergoglio for collaboration with the military dictatorship. There are still witnesses who can provide facts and prove Bergoglio’s manipulation of information. The book is a de facto purposeful apologia for Bergoglio’s crimes, which he coldly glorifies.


Bergoglio also touches on the subject of his so-called staunch defence of human life, “from conception to death”, where he correctly labels abortion as “murder”, performed by “hired killers, hitmen!”, and the practice of surrogacy as “inhumane”.


Commentary: Bergoglio suggestively calls abortion murder and radically condemns abortion doctors as hired killers, hitmen. In reality, however, this is again just his method of psychological manipulation in order to create a favourable public opinion of him and to silence the legitimate criticisms of his opponents. The fact is that Bergoglio publicly honours mass abortionists and excommunicates priests who fight to save unborn children. The bishops deny Holy Communion to the top politicians in the US who advocate abortion up to the ninth month, but Bergoglio himself provocatively gave them Holy Communion.


Bergoglio manipulatively seems to admit his mistakes and writes: “… I made mistakes because of my authoritarian attitude, to the extent of being accused of being ultraconservative.”

Commentary: Bergoglio here gives the impression of suffering for defending orthodoxy. In fact, he is committing gross authoritarianism leading to the total destruction of orthodoxy!


In his book, Bergoglio also tries to justify his criminal pseudo pandemic propaganda. He abused his usurped authority and set a criminal precedent of dictatorship. He had the entire Vatican vaccinated twice under threat of dismissal from office. No country reached such a totalitarian state of affairs. The solid, incorruptible scientists who warned against experimental vaccination were denigrated by him as frauds.


Furthermore, his autobiography is a defence and promotion of a climate and sodomite anti-gospel. He promotes the lie about the climate crisis, and he legitimizes and blesses the sin of sodomy. In doing so, he denies the Saviour, repentance, and forgiveness of sins. He encourages youth not to maintain order and wholesome discipline, but to create chaos, ultimately resulting in moral decay and crime. Bergoglio writes: “And if some brother bishops decide not to follow this path (of blessing gay couples), it does not mean that this is the antechamber of a schism, because the doctrine of the Church is not questioned.”


Commentary: The fact is that the doctrine of the Church is not only questioned by Bergoglio but literally destroyed at the root. This is not just the antechamber of a schism, but the highest stage of Bergoglio’s apostasy – rebellion against God the Creator and Saviour. The essence of the Creed and Decalogue is denied. This proves that there is already the New Age anti-Church under the banner of the Catholic Church. Those who want to be saved must radically break with Bergoglio’s anti-gospel, and above all his suicidal Fiducia Supplicans.


Moreover, Bergoglio’s destructive activities are destroying the papacy itself. But he again manipulatively refutes this fact in his book. What is the aim of Bergoglio’s autobiography? To defend and promote the apostate path which, though diametrically opposed to Scripture and Tradition, is relentlessly pioneered by him. This path leads not only to the loss of conscience and reason, but also to the loss of eternal salvation!

+ Elijah
Patriarch of the Byzantine Catholic Patriarchate

+ Methodius OSBMr + Timothy OSBMr
Secretary Bishops

19 March 2024

Critical review of Francis Bergoglio’s autobiographical book
https://vkpatriarhat.org/it/?p=10617 /italiano/
https://vkpatriarhat.org/fr/?p=17544 /français/
https://vkpatriarhat.org/es/?p=13800 /español/


Subscribe to BCP newsletters https://lb.benchmarkemail.com//listbuilder/signupnew?5hjt8JVutE6d9VVH68P1FP5pwVnAjsSIi5iGuoPZdjDtO5iNRn8gS049TyW7spdJ

Paglia: Italy’s abortion law is a ‘pillar of society”

Published on by Kathy ClubbLeave a comment

They said it would never happen – “they” being the Feting Francis Fan Club.

“They” said the Vatican’s sodo-clerics would never abandon the Church’s teaching on the sanctity of life. How wrong they were.

One of his closest (and most effeminate) allies, Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia, President of the Pontifical Academy for Life, has told media that the Catholic Church doesn’t want to get rid of the Italian law which legalises abortion.

Referring to the child-killing Law 194 as a “pillar of our social life”, Paglia then went on to say something vaguely Catholic about problems with the declining birth rate.

TOO LATE, YOUR GRACE. The cat is out of the bag. You are not pro-life.

Commenting on the abomination, Archbishop Vigano said,

It is emblematic and revealing that the sect of apostates who infest the Catholic Hierarchy and have occupied its highest levels find themselves aligned with the ideological positions of the enemies of Christ, not only on issues that are seemingly unconnected – like the psychopandemic narrative and green ideology – but also in the denial of the very foundations of the Natural Law, including respect for life from conception to natural death.

Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano

Speaking of abominations, no reference to Paglia would be complete without remembering what he said after Roe vs Wade and Dobbs laws were aborted. At that time, Paglia issued a statement on behalf of the Pontifical Academy for Life saying that “It is not right that the problem (of abortion) is set aside without adequate overall consideration.”

Meaning that it is not right that the Supreme Court should strike down an abortion law.

Because – and this is his main objection to child sacrifice – abortion is bad for the economy.

Demographic suicide = bad. Killing babies = a pillar of society.

You can’t have it both ways, Your Grace. the more frivolous among us might suggest that you pick a side, but unfortunately, the side you have chosen is all too obvious.

Ms Hoban deletes her complicity with abortion

Published on by Kathy ClubbLeave a comment

Since my article of last week, which explained how Melbourne’s Archbishop Peter Comensoli hired an ex-Marie Stopes employee for his Professional Standards Unit, the woman in question, Loretta Hoban, has mysteriously updated her LinkedIn profile.

Now, only a few days ago, Ms Hoban was proud to advertise her time with the prestigious Marie Stopes. And why not? MSI slaughters 5.6 million unborn babies worldwide per annum so is no second-rate baby-killing outfit. MSI is obviously very professional about it, too: why else would the Archbishop choose a pro-abortion feminist over the hundreds of faithful Catholics who were qualified for the job – and who have never come within an inch of being complicit with abortion?

Anyway, in the last few days, it would appear that Ms Hoban has had second thoughts and no longer wants the world to know of her ties to Marie Stopes.

Strange that she left details of her work with the equally anti-life CARE International, Red Cross, Oxfam and Asia Foundation. (Hint: anyone trying to cover their tracks when it comes to involvement with abortion might want to replace the term “sexual and reproductive health” with something a little more, well…. prolife?)

Here’s a comparison of Ms Hoban’s CV of last week with the current one:

LAST WEEK: Ms Hoban was only too happy to provide details of the pro-abortion, pro-contraception Know and Grow project in which she participated in Cambodia
THIS WEEK: struck by a sudden bout of humility, Ms Hoban has hidden her involvement with Know and Grow, but not to worry – that li’l old article at Buzzfeed is still up and it fills in the gaps….
LAST WEEK: Ms Hoban’s experience with Marie Stopes was related in great detail ….
THIS WEEK: Marie Stopes is nowhere to be found.

Far be it from me to suggest that Ms Hoban’s editing spree is due to the article that appeared on this site – but it really is quite the coincidence.

It would be nice to think that in this case, the pen was mightier than the sword, but unfortunately, when it comes to dismembered babies, that just isn’t so. Their blood still cries to heaven, and responsibility for that can’t be simply wiped away with the stroke of a computer key.