Pagan Idol Bishop Gets Promoted?!

republished from The Remnant.

It is by now common knowledge that Pope Leo XIV has made another highly inappropriate episcopal appointment in the person of Shane Mackinlay, currently Bishop of Sandhurst. To rub salt into the wounds of faithful Catholics, this new appointment will include Mackinlay’s promotion to the rank of Archbishop, as he takes over the Archdiocese of Brisbane, Queensland.

Bishop  Mackinlay has become prominent in recent months over his unrepentant installation of a demonic idol inside Sacred Heart Cathedral. Despite repeated calls for the removal of the infamous idol, and a petition singed by more than a thousand people, Bishop Mackinlay refused to back down. The idol had been part of a local art exhibition, and was openly linked by its creator with the occult, specifically with the condemned practices of Tarot card reading and witchcraft. Its placement in the Cathedral, as part of an esoteric ‘pilgrimage’ made a mockery of true Catholic pilgrimages and of Catholic belief itself.

Eventually, the laity stepped in and the idol was ‘relocated‘ by three anonymous men in broad daylight. No apology was ever provided by Bishop Mackinlay to deeply offended Catholics nor was a statement made by the diocese about the statue’s removal from the Cathedral.

The pagan idol display was only one of a series of incidents that point to Bishop Mackinlay’s failure to enforce the Catholic religion in his diocese, as ongoing scandals have been quite a feature of his tenure there. 

The pagan idol display was only one of a series of incidents that point to Bishop Mackinlay’s failure to enforce the Catholic religion in his diocese, as ongoing scandals have been quite a feature of his tenure there.  One recent incident highlights the diocese’s commitment to extreme ecumenism with its accompanying liturgical laxity. 

On that occasion, an Anglican priestess gave the appearance of concelebrating Mass. The woman, a known lesbian, remained near the altar during a Novus Ordo Mass and was administered Holy Communion. She even helped herself to a chalice containing the Precious Blood until it was retrieved by the hapless Catholic priest who has apparently suffered no consequences for his actions from the Bishop. While some good, orthodox priests do exist in Sandhurst diocese, these are few and far between, and they have been living with a constant fear of being targeted by their Bishop.

It is being argued that, along with other recent episcopal appointments made by Pope Leo, this one was in the pipeline long before he became Pope. That rings hollow, however, when one considers his position prior to becoming Pope, for the former Cardinal Robert Prevost was, in fact, Prefect of the Dicastery for Bishops. Having been in that position since January 2023, Cardinal Prevost was one of the churchmen best placed to evaluate the suitability or otherwise of our bishops.

According to the local Catholic grape-vine, Bishop Mackinlay had been earmarked for the Archdiocese of Brisbane for some time. This means that his name was already pencilled in for the position while Cardinal Prevost was still at the Dicastery for Bishops.

According to the local Catholic grape-vine, Bishop Mackinlay had been earmarked for the Archdiocese of Brisbane for some time. This means that his name was already pencilled in for the position while Cardinal Prevost was still at the Dicastery for Bishops. Thus there is little doubt that, due to his former position, Pope Leo is well aware that Bishop Mackinlay is in favour of ordained women deacons as well as Fiducia Supplicans, which the latter believes to be a “significant step forward.”

Bishop Mackinlay is also known internationally for his adherence to the Bergoglian theme of synodality and, just months ago, he released what can only be called a propaganda video extolling the virtues of this Modernist innovation. Note that in the video, pro-life activists are portrayed as antagonists who fail to ‘dialogue’ while, perhaps unsurprisingly, those of other faiths are portrayed as being respectful and therefore able to ‘enrich’ Catholics.

The inappropriateness of Bishop Mackinlay’s new appointment has not been lost on many in the Church. Bishop Strickland criticised the move on social media, drawing attention to Bishop Mackinlay’s stance on female deacons. Bishop Strickland stated that the appointment “raises serious pastoral and doctrinal questions”, saying that “appointing a bishop who holds such views to shepherd a major archdiocese is a source of scandal and division. The faithful deserve clarity, not ambiguity; fidelity, not experimentation.”

Yet, in one sense, the appointment of Archbishop-elect Shane Mackinlay could be seen as being entirely appropriate, as his future Archdiocese is even more notorious than his current one. The Archdiocese of Brisbane has been led by Mark Coleridge since 2012 and he is a man who is possibly even more dedicated to squashing tradition and promoting heterodoxy than is Bishop Mackinlay.

Drawing together all these threads, one can only wonder what criteria is being used by the Dicastery for Bishops when selecting our prelates. For it would be no surprise to learn that those with more than a passing interest in the occult are deliberately being sent to dioceses with a history of tolerating and even promoting New Age practices.

While Bishop Mackinlay has allowed Latin Masses to continue in the Sandhurst Diocese – albeit with caveats – since the introduction of Traditiones Custodes, Archbishop Coleridge has been far less understanding. In 2023, he banished the well-attended Latin Masses offered by the Brisbane Oratory to the nearby parish hall. The Masses had formerly been held in a stunning heritage church which had been sympathetically renovated.

It was Archbishop Coleridge who, during the COVID hysteria, enforced government mandates to an extreme degree – even threatening his priests with removal of faculties if they did not comply with vaccination mandates. Prior to that, Archbishop Coleridge allowed a sacrilegious and indecent performance in one of his churches and possibly enlisted Cardinal Blase Cupich to cover up for him over sex abuse allegations. It was also on Coleridge’s watch as President of the Australian Catholic Bishops Conference that Freemasons were given permission to remain Catholics in good standing.

Archbishop Coleridge pictured with Fr. Marko Rupnik.

The Archdiocese of Brisbane has a history of heterodoxy and scandal, going all the way back to the 1980’s with then-Bishop Cuskelly and Archbishop Rush. Those two clerics, along with a bevy of priests, introduced into the Archdiocese of Brisbane revolutionary ideas such as a democratised Church and the potential for ordination of women. The wider acceptance of sodomy among Catholics can be traced back to this era.

After that came Archbishop Bathersby who infamously allowed a host of New Age practices to flourish within the Brisbane Archdiocese during the 1990’s. That included everything from nuns worshipping Gaia to alchemists lecturing seminarians.

There could only be one goal in such a grim scenario: that of further entrenching anti-Christianity in areas which are catechetical wastelands. Let us hope and pray for God to draw good from these disastrous appointments.

One highlight (or lowlight) during these decades, with particular relevance to Bishop Mackinlay, was a notorious shrine that appeared in Brisbane’s St. Stephen’s Cathedral. The shrine, entitled, The Human Search for God, was an anti-Christic collection of indigenous totems, fertility symbols and motifs related to pagan spirits and tribal ancestor worship. Some Catholics even discerned references to the magick rituals of Aleister Crowley in the designs.  Outrageously, the collection was in place for seven years.

Although the exhibition has now been removed, other disturbing artworks remain at St. Stephen’s including a bizarre crucifix over the main altar.

St. Stephen’s Cathedral’s Resurrected Christ crucifix

Read the rest at The Remnant Newspaper.

Bendigo Cathedral’s pagan idol vanishes!

A recent article on this website reported on a scandalous ‘artwork’ being exhibited at Sacred Heart Cathedral, Bendigo. Despite the statue’s creator publicly and explicitly explaining that the inspiration for his work was witchcraft, tarot cards and occult philosophy, the Bishop responsible for the Cathedral refused to have the image removed.

Massive pushback from the laity and other clergymen in the form of letters, phone-calls, emails and petitions did not have the desired effect as Bishop Shane Mackinlay and his Diocesan bureaucrats confirmed that the idol would remain in the Cathedral for the duration of the exhibition: an entire three months.

Blatant Occultism in Bendigo Cathedral
The occult-inspired art work in Bendigo Cathedral

However, at some point during the past week, three unknown individuals decided to take matters into their own hands and quietly removed the disgusting image from Sacred Heart. A picture circulating on social media shows the spot where the idol had formerly been placed; its clay foundation, its sheer covering and the information stand remain.

The former site of the hideous idol inside the Cathedral.

The artist, Ben Wrigley, confirmed the theft on his Instagram page (while also showing his ignorance of the Commandments – the directive not to steal is Commandment number 7.)

Transcendence Wand #4 was reported to me this afternoon as having been stolen from inside the Sacred Heart Cathedral, Bendigo, today by three men.

This work depicts the transcendence of being bound by the dense material world. Of the lightness of being. The veil symbolises the gossamer thing significance of moving from the gross self to illuminated being and becoming closer to god.
One of five interconnected works representing five stations of life. L
The significance of the transgression of these three men is palpable. The eighth commandment – thou shall not steal and from a place of worship.
I look forward to having it returned.

To date, there has been no official statement from either Bishop Mackinlay or the Diocese of Sandhurst regarding the idol’s removal.

It is gratifying to know that there are still men within our ranks of the calibre of Saint Boniface who will refuse to allow holy places to be defiled by pagan images. Our prayers this week should include some for the vigilantes’ protection and well as for the conversion of Bishop Mackinlay to the Catholic faith.

Blatant Occultism in Bendigo Cathedral

UPDATE: a petition to have this idol removed from Bendigo Cathedral can be found here. Please sign it and share!

An art installation based on tarot cards and witch’s wands is currently on display in a Catholic Cathedral in country Victoria. It comprises a hideous figure reminiscent of a Buddhist idol, covered with a sheer cloth and sprouting five ‘flames’ which seemingly mock the Five Wounds of Christ.

The bizarre idol inside the Cathedral

A Pagan Pilgrimage

Artist, Ben Wrigley, designed the artwork as part of his pagan ‘pilgrimage’ around the town of Bendigo. Participants are encouraged to visit five stations where his art is installed and there to meditate on five points in human life: conception at LaTrobe University (‘amoeba’); birth at St. John of God hospital (‘matter becoming’); adulthood/consumerism at the Old Church on the Hill (‘bowl of plenty’); death at a cemetery (‘river of tears’); and the next life at Sacred Heart Cathedral. This final station is designated ‘transcendence’ and will, as the artist states ” ….resonate within the sacred space, embodying the tension between the earthly materiality and the spiritual.”

Each of the pilgrimage sites hosts an artwork which is meant to embody a milestone of human existence and all of the pieces are made from the same 100-year-old pine tree. Trees are of great significance in the esoteric world, with the pine among those particularly valued since the occult version of Our Lord – the ‘Saviour-God’ or ‘World Martyr’ – is worshipped under the appearance of the pine.

Linked to Tarot Cards

The name of the pilgrimage is ‘The Wands,’ which is a reference to tarot cards: wands correspond to the suit of clubs, cups to the suit of hearts, swords to spades and coins to diamonds. 

The pilgrimage is a said to be a metaphor for one particular card, the Five of Wands. According to tarot practitioners, the Five of Wands represents conflict among different groups who disagree; each person represents a different tribe or group. Some tarot traditions interpret the conflict as being good-natured and even merely ‘for show.’

A traditional Five Wands tarot card.
A more modern representation of the Five Wands card.

The Cathedral Installation

Inside the Cathedral, there is an information panel to explain the artist’s rationale for creating the idol. In his words, it represents an ‘enlightened one’ who appeared to him in a dream and who is so resplendent that it needs to be covered.

We are born into matter. dense and needy, hungry. While there is much to be enjoyed, and loved and cherished, there is much pain and suffering; and to practise being ‘held in the hand of God’, to have faith, we can find incremental enlightening along the way. To transcend, to ascent, we can experience being lighter.

This work, Transcendence, is representative of achieving, of becoming fully enlightened beings. Very few achieve this state and to look upon them is too much for one’s mind, our dense selves, hence they are veiled, ethereal. This veil also represents the gossamer thin line between ignorance and understanding. One hand up and one hand down, as above and so below, or ‘as it is in heaven so it is on earth.’ The mound they float above is the matter of which we are born. “We are made of clay”, says John O’Donoghue1, and the lotus has its roots in the mud and our ascension is up, towards enlightened.

We are of the earth, we are made of earth, the earth is us.

This image of ‘Transcendence’ came to me as a vision in a nocturnal dream, replete with flames and colour. Concave feminine and convex masculine. Unlike the other four wands, Transcendence is figurative and detailed. I have been faithful to the image I received, for this is the work, to be present to the gifts and trust, the Great Mystery, to God.

The information panel inside Sacred Heart cathedral.

The idol has similarities with Baphomet, as it exhibits both male and female characteristics (“Concave feminine and convex masculine”), and its hands are positioned in the familiar ‘as above, so below’ gestures.

In his explanation, Wrigley also references “The Great Work” (” … for this is the work…”) which is perhaps the key to his entire exhibition. In the esoteric world, the ‘Great Work’ is to discover one’s destiny and to achieve unity with the infinite. The tools employed in doing this work include meditation, Western ceremonial magic, Hermetic Qabalah, yoga and tarot. Collectively, these tools are known as ‘magick.’ Aleister Crowley described the Great Work as “the uniting of opposites …. the uniting of the soul with God, of the microcosm with the macrocosm, of the female with the male, of the ego with the non-ego.”

The idol in Bendigo’s Cathedral clearly illustrates the principles of the Great Work. Its hand gestures and androgyny exemplify the uniting of opposites – not to mention the attempt to unite Catholicism with diabolical mysticism – while, as an ‘enlightened one’, the statue represents unity with the divine. The ‘Third Eye’ symbol on the idol’s brow is a further indication of achieving union with the infinite, thus providing an initiate access to hidden knowledge.

A close-up of the idol’s face taken from the Wands’ website. The sexual overtones in the ‘Third Eye’ symbol are quite clear.

All of this should have been enough to alert the Diocese of Sandhurst, in which the Cathedral is situated, to the diabolical nature of the art installation. Yet, Shane McKinley, Bishop of Sandhurst, claims to have been unaware of the artwork’s occult themes until parishioners pointed out a reference to witchcraft on the official website of the Five Wands pilgrimage.

When describing Ben Wrigley’s use of the fallen pine-tree, the website originally included this statement: His work began with a fallen 100-year-old pine tree, which he saw as a living, breathing entity much like the divination tools used by witches and warlocks who traditionally craft their wands from live trees with the tree’s permission.

The words in bold have now been removed from the Wands website. Bishop McKinley acknowledges the witchcraft reference in the standard response his Diocese is emailing to concerned Catholics. He writes:

” ….the wording that promoted these concerns was not included in the information provided to the Diocese prior to the artwork’s installation and is not part of the signage accompanying the artwork itself. The wording was only present on the website of the overall project. In order to avoid any further confusion or concern about the artwork’s inspiration, the artist has now removed this wording from the website….”

If the good Bishop thinks that by removing a few words he can change the nature of the sacrilegious display in his Cathedral, then he is severely deluded. The very look of the idol itself is enough to alert the most casual Catholic observer as to its unsuitability for a Catholic church.

  1. The late John O’Donoghue was an ex-Catholic priest and New Age writer. ↩︎

Australian Bishops are in the Synodal Way

Even though they missed out on the red hat, three of Australia’s bishops remain happy to carry water for the Synod.

One of them is Shane Mackinlay, bishop of Sandhurst, who is representing the Bishops Conference at the Synod in Rome. According to McKinley, Fiducia Supplicans was a direct result of the Synod. He told a press conference that although the Pope didn’t act synodally by issuing the heretical document, that’s fine by him:

“As with many things Pope Francis has done in the last year, he did not wait for the final document. He has already responded to things that were raised in the discussions and in the final report last year.”

This is despite the Pope stating that he would absolutely not be making a decision on same-sex unions before the second Synod sessions.

According to Mackinlay, “Fiducia supplicans is a significant step forward … and then I think those of us from the West are not so surprised that in some other parts of the world it is received differently and has a different kind of priority.”

Yes, it is received differently because ‘in some parts of the world’ the Bishops are actually Catholic! Mackinlay is so popular in Rome that he was elected for the second time as the Oceania representative for the Commission for the Final Document of the Synod – quite the appointment.

Another Synod apparatchik is Archbishop Timothy Costelloe, no stranger to these pages. As Archbishop of Perth and president of the Australian Catholic Bishops’ Conference, Costelloe is completely onboard with the Synod’s agenda of re-imagining Catholicism. He couldn’t hide his enthusiasm for heterodox novelty when he told Vatican News that it was great to have priests, women, and lay people usurping to role of the Bishops by being given full voting rights instead of having a ‘back row seat’.

“It shows us the equality and unity of all. Unity is communion of mind and heart, of spirit and action, and of faith at the service of the Church’s evangelising mission.”

This ‘unity’ is nowhere to be found either at the Synod or outside of it, of course. The persecution of traditional Catholics and the clamouring voices of dissenters from the Faith are evidence of that.

Archbishop Costelloe also explained that the so-called ‘conversation in the spirit’ “serves to free oneself from prejudices. The Synod must convert us from a competitive approach to a spirit of listening because in this way it will be of real and effective help to the Pope.”

He posed a few more rhetorical questions: “Should the Synod office be restructured in favour of the local Churches? If so, how? And could the reports become documents to be published?”

Now, don’t worry too much if you don’t have the answer to these questions. Something tells me that the Synod Fathers (and Mothers) already have the answers – pencilled in from Day 1.

The third Australian Synod mouthpiece is Anthony Randazzo, Bishop of Broken Bay diocese, who seems to have mastered the art of verbally giving with one hand while taking with the other.

One the one hand, Randazzo criticises those who are ‘obsessed’ by the issue of women’s ordination. But look at the reasons he gives as objections to it:

“Those issues become all-consuming and focusing for people, to the point that they then become an imposition on people who sometimes struggle simply to feed their families, to survive the rising sea levels, or the dangerous journeys across wild oceans to resettle in new lands.”

The Catholic Diocese of Broken Bay website reports that while Randazzo has ‘no problem with the topic of women’s ordination being discussed and studied at the Synod’, he thinks it should be poor women and not wealthy, well-educated ones who call for it. What? So now the disobedient notion of ordaining women is only wrong when it is attached to white privilege?

Maybe someone needs to tell His Grace that the Amazonian women are way ahead of the curve. They are already receiving a para-liturgical blessing from their Cardinal before beginning their ‘ministry’ of distributing the Sacraments.

How anyone can think this matter was not laid to rest in the past with an infallible statement is beyond me.