‘BCE’ was invented by a Freemason

There has been much criticism of a decision by the Vatican to issue a document which included the dating system ‘BCE’ rather than the customary ‘BC.’ The document in question was a letter from the Pope about the usefulness of literature; he included two dates to exemplify St. Paul’s ‘evangelical discernment of culture’ (whatever that is.).

Although some historians believe that BCE (before the common era) is not meant to be an insult to Jesus Christ (BC of course refers to ‘before Christ’), a look into the origin of the term shows that this is unlikely to be the case. That is because the inventor of BCE was a Mason and as such was influenced by anti-Christian ideology.

The origins of the Christian dating system of BC and AD can be traced back at least as far as the 6th century, when a monk tabled the dates of Easter in reference to anni Domini nostri Jesu Christi, that is, “years of our Lord Jesus Christ.” 

The system was popularised by the Venerable Bede, who was active in the 7th century. Bede’s works included the phrase, ante incarnationis dominicae tempus, meaning ‘before the time of the incarnation of the Lord’ as well as anno ab incarnatione Domini, meaning ‘in the year from the incarnation of the Lord’ and anno incarnationis Dominicae, meaning ‘in the year of the incarnation of the Lord.’ Bede’s dating system became standard by the time of Charlemagne and was abbreviated over time to the two letters now in use.

BCE, however, was brought into use much later by the scientist, Johannes Kepler. Kepler, a German, lived from 1571 to 1630 and was ostensibly a Lutheran. He is known for his contributions to the study of planetary motion and celestial mechanics; his three laws governing planetary motion are still used today by astronomers.

As well as studying astronomy, Kepler was also an adept in astrology – something omitted from modern school textbooks!

Kepler is said to have been initiated into Freemasonry in 1620 at Prague’s Bohemian Union Lodge.

Kepler, left, shown with a compass.


SOURCE: Ludwig Günther, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

In his book, Eclogae Chronicae, published in 1615, Kepler used the terminology anno aerae nostrae vulgaris (in our common era.) Kepler offered no explanation for the change, and it was repeated here and there over the next couple of hundred years, in several non-English-speaking parts of Europe.

1708 marked the first time the phrase ‘common era’ was used in an English book, The History of the Works of the Learned. By the mid 19th century, CE and BCE had come into common use, popularised by Jews who did not want to honour the salvific birth of Christ. Nowadays, BCE and CE continue to be promoted by atheists who refuse to ‘privilege Christianity,’ as well as by those who do not wish to offend non-Christians.

Thus when a Pope decides to use BCE instead of BC, he reveals a Masonic preference for religious indifferentism or worse: that the Incarnation and birth of Jesus Christ were not the pivotal events in the history of mankind.

SOURCES: https://talesoftimesforgotten.com/2021/12/05/a-history-of-the-common-era-bce-ce-dating-system/

https://www.learnreligions.com/bc-vs-bce-which-should-we-use-250186

https://esotericfreemasons.com/most-famous-modern-day-freemasons

This French Mystic predicted the Adrenochrome trade

Blessed Marie-Julie Jahenny is well-known for her prophecies about the rise of a false Church and the Three Days’ Darkness, but a newly-released book on Marian prophecies includes rare predictions from the mystic which include references to cannibalism and the adrenochrome trade.

Adrenochrome, for those who aren’t aware, is the highly-prized nectar of the ‘elites’; a chemical harvested from the pineal gland of innocent children who have been deliberately terrified in order to increase its potency. It became mainstream after being mentioned by Johnny Depp’s character in the film, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas. As this article mentions, though, it was referenced by Aldous Huxley, William Blake and others long before the advent of Hollywood.

Marie-Julie also had some inspirations about other aspects of our civilisation’s decline, as if to confirm the abysmal state of this evil generation. She foresaw a totalitarian society complete with surveillance and detention, as well as a return to the use of the guillotine – that highly-favoured implement of French revolutionaries:

The strong political party will be the one of evil’s victory … the small number will fall under the thunder of these voices who call for the blood and the flesh of bodies to “stretch their instruments” as they say. The Christian judges will be replaced in every part of France. The people will have to submit to surveillers or being sent to prison and finish one’s life under cutting weapons.

(Julie-Marie Jahenny, Jan 1882)

The guillotine was developed during the French Revolution, & its results featured chillingly in the Olympics Opening Ceremony.
SOURCE Museum of the French Revolution, CC BY-SA 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

I have no idea about what “stretching their instruments” refers to, but when searching, I came across a technique used in genetic experimentation known as “stretching”. Whether or not this is related to the prophecy, there is no doubt that many of the chastisements seen by Marie-Julie Jahenny stem from the world’s obsession with Scientism and that realm’s fascination with cells stolen from aborted babies. Another quote:

…today it [the world] makes a hellish trade, the likes of which the world has never seen before … All is delivered up, everything is sold and new plots are being hatched every day. The hunger to devour human flesh, the thirst for human blood makes all their bodies seethe with unrest, and consumed with a desire to reach their goal as soon as possible.

(Julie-Marie Jahenny, Nov 1924)

So what is this “hellish trade” to which Julie-Marie was referring? Sex-trafficking? Abortion? Organ harvesting on an industrial scale such as goes on in China? She seems to be alluding to something more evil even than these.

Julie-Marie spoke of the “devouring” of human flesh and of the drinking of human blood. This is obviously cannibalism, vampirism and addiction to adrenochrome.

Nothing is more ‘hellish’ than knowing there are powerful adults who misuse innocent children for their own pleasure and profit.

These activities point to a civilisation on the brink of extinction; Hilaire Belloc, for one, believed cannibalism was the sign of a civilisation about to be annihilated. That certainly sounds like our Western culture and when the New York Times starts running articles about cannibalism, it is obvious that perversion has gone mainstream.

But we knew that, didn’t we? The Opening Ceremony of the Paris Olympics summed up the world’s obsession with perversion very succinctly. It has even been said, very insightfully, that it was the ‘Closing Ceremony of Western civilization.’

And here is something really bizarre: the article above tells of an episode of the TV drama, Lewis in which devotees of the false god, Dionysus were taking adrenochrome. Dionysus, of course, was represented by the ‘blue man’ of the Paris Olympics Opening Ceremony.

Whether you believe that adrenochrome is a real substance harvested by elites from terrified children, or whether you think it is Q-Anon bunkum, one thing is for sure: God can’t be too happy with the current state of things on earth. The transexualism, perversion, abortion, organ harvesting and violence predicted by Blessed Marie-Julie Jahenny a hundred years ago have all come to pass.

And if that isn’t worthy of divine intervention, then nothing is.

NOTE: this article was updated August 7th, 2024.

IMAGE CREDITS: Eduardo Hidalgo Downing, CC BY-SA 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0, via Wikimedia Commons; https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d6/Maria_Julia_Jahenny.gif

Was John XXIII Really Initiated into the Rosicrucians?

stories of pope John’s occult involvement abound, but it is only recently that i have begun to take them seriously. some of you may think i am foolish for even considering the prospect.

As time has gone on and I have undertaken more research, this accusation seems somewhat more credible than it first appeared to be. Certainly, to my knowledge, Rome has never put out a statement denying the story of John’s occult initiation.

The following is taken from Pier Carpi’s ‘Les Propheties du Pape Jean XXIII’, which was written in the late ’70’s. Along with the alleged prophecies is an account of the Rosicrucian initiation ritual apparently undertaken by Angelo Roncalli when he was stationed in Bulgaria.

I present it here for you in the interests of pursuing the truth about Pope John, the Council and the influence of the occult on the Church during the twentieth century.

We pick up the story at a conversation between Carpi and an occultist. (The text has been run through an online translation tool so may be a bit rough in places.)

The old man took up the document and put it back in the azure blue napkin. “I must not add anything to that. You will have understood the fundamental importance of this table. It constitutes a real restoration of the esoteric tradition that allows the initiates to be free initiators. To choose their disciples, to to form the chain — down through their descendants.”

I knew the tradition but I knew nothing about this document and the reality of the meeting between the three masters in Paris. The old man put down his napkin, got up and went to the window, set aside the white curtains that hid the night, as if he was looking for someone or something in the darkness. He turned around, stood and looked at me. “The evening I met you in Saint-Léon, I told you about the books of ‘T’ and ‘M’.”

“You told me that, like my other friend, you had read them in a dream”.

“If it can be called a dream. Alas! We must use secular terms that betray the content of our thought. However, I feel that we understand each other. If I am here, it is because I have something else to show you, something that needs to be disclosed, that must be made public. But, before I demonstrate it to you, I must tell you the facts.”

He returned to his seat, took up his napkin, which he pressed still more tightly against him and stared at me intensely: “I have to tell you about a man that everyone knows. Angelo Roncalli.”

“John XXIII?”

Here we pause to consider the motivation Carpi may have had for writing a book about John XXIII. By this time, John had been dead for almost fifteen years so it could not undermine his papacy. Carpi does not attempt to taint John’s legacy: from the point of view of an occultist, the book actually benefits John’s image. This leads us to wonder if Carpi had no other motivation than to tell the truth.

He hesitated for a moment, his eyes half-closed: “Jean,” he murmured. “1935 ….. Life was not easy for Angelo Roncalli, Archbishop of Mesembria, delegate in Turkey. Like all other religious, he was made to wear civilian dress, because of persecutions. Under constant surveillance, it was difficult for him to move: the spies were everywhere. Yet all those who approached him at that moment found in him a great serenity, which was not only that joy which he knew so well how to transmit, especially in difficult times.

“It was precisely at this time that his first contact with the unknown world took place.

“That evening Angelo Roncalli hastily retired to his apartments, as if he had an appointment. He lay down on his bed after undressing without the help of anyone – he had always done so and was to continue to do so, even when he became pope.

“Before turning off the light, he looked at the pictures on the walls, images of the extended family. He closed his eyes and, while continuing his prayer, all the faces encountered that day flashed through his mind, especially those of the most humble people. Could he have expected it? More faces, smiles, sad eyes. Then sleep invaded him. But he would never know if it was really sleep. He had an appointment with the old man of sleep.

“Six nights in a row he had seen him. It was the seventh. The most important and perhaps the last.

“He appeared; old, very white hair, thin face, dark skin, eyes sweet and piercing.

” “Will you be able to recognize me?” he asked.

” “Always, master.”

“Then, suddenly, the sacred books of ‘T’ and ‘M’ appeared in his hands. He leafed through. Inscribed on paper, knowledge, the words of knowledge, in a a language that Angelo had never known, never read before. But from his first rendezvous with the old man, in a dream which was perhaps not a dream, Angelo had known how to decipher it.

“He read and everything became simple. God, how simple everything was, how clear everything was! If the other men might have known, the world could have been very different. But Angelo realised it was not given to everyone to know, because these things could be dangerous. Only a few could give them a correct meaning, use them to the good of all. In malevolent hands, they could become terrible weapons against man.

“The two books closed. An intense light illuminated their covers on which were inscribed the two silver letters in relief – a light like the one Angelo felt within him. Impalpable, intransmissible by the poor instruments at man’s disposal; for millennia, has man not renounced forces, powers, and knowledge to replace them by a way as difficult as it is useless?

” “Now you are ready,” said the old man. “And you’re on your way. I came because you called me. Now you know. But you still have a lot to learn, to see, to live. That’s why we’ll see each other again.”

” “I’m waiting for you, master.”

“The old man smiled. “Will you be able to recognize me?”

“He repeated the same question three times. Three times Angelo gave the same answer. Then he woke up. He was alone in his room. He got up from the bed, went to the table, took some sheets of paper of paper and a pencil. He tried to write down what he had read in the books of knowledge. But his hand remained inert, his mind empty.

“It was not possible. Words did not exist. Yet he had something in him – something that no one, could ever erase. That light had made him another man. He knew that the dream would never happen again. That the old man would return, but in reality. What else awaited him? He was not afraid because he knew he was on the the right way, that of the Good. He put down the pencil and thought.

“He thought of the saints, the mystics, the men of faith, of the Church, men of truth and of peace. He took pleasure in remembering St. John the Evangelist, St. Anthony, St. Albert the Grand, St. Teresa, St. Francis. He rose, stopped in front of the crucifix, knelt down and prayed to the Virgin Mary for a long time.

“She too had an apparition. Was it not in a dream that her destiny was fulfilled, when someone appeared to the sleeping Joseph to explain to him, in very simple words, the greatest of mysteries of faith, of all humanity?

“He felt happy. And for the first time that night, he knew that someone was praying for him, in a big secret way.”

The old man had finished his story. I looked at him: “They met?” I asked.

He confirmed it. Seven days later, to be exact. Angelo Roncalli celebrated the sacraments in his humble house, before an even more humble community. While the others were going to work before lunch, Angelo went downstairs. In the hallway, sitting on a chair, stood the old man of his dream. No one had heard him knock or ring. But Angelo didn’t even wonder how he could have gotten in. He approached him and kissed him, as one embraces a brother who returns after a long absence. He invited him to his table but the other shook his head, smiling: “We must sit at a completely different table,” he said. Angelo looked at him. As the old man of his dream had asked him, he had immediately recognized him, and he listened.

“Are you ready?”

“I don’t know”.

“Then you are.” Leave everything and follow me. He followed him, without telling anyone. For a long time they marched through the deserted city. The old man stopped in a small narrow square, with its low houses. He who, until then, had guided Angelo, turned and said:

“Since you are ready, since you will soon be my equal, since the path we have to follow will be the same, you know it too. It is now up to you to lead me.”

Angelo hesitated, looking around him. The man encouraged him:

“Let’s go”.

He advanced and chose without hesitation an alley, and entered it. Behind him, he could hear the footsteps of the old one. He stopped in front of a door of rough wood.

“Is it there?” he asked. The other smiled.

“Push the door, it’s only half closed. Climb up the stairs and don’t wait for me”.

Angelo let himself be led by the voice he felt within him. He climbed two small staircases in almost total darkness, found himself in front of a new door, even smaller and lower than the other, and pushed it. It was ajar and he knew it. He entered.

The room was large and pentagonal. The walls were bare. There were two large windows, closed. In the middle of the room, there was a large cedar table, also pentagonal. There were three chairs, leaning against three of the walls. On the chairs, a linen tunic, coloured belts and envelopes sealed with red. On the table, a Bible opened at the beginning of the Gospel of Saint John. There was a flaming sword with silver hilt; a censer; coloured ribbons; two bronze candelabra with three branches, each bearing three red candles. Then the magical and esoteric symbol of the Order to which Angelo would shortly be initiated. Under the symbol, there were three crossed roses, made of fabric. One white, one red, one black.

The only dim lighting came from the three candles lit on one of the two lampposts. The others were extinguished. Angelo stood in front of the table. He looked at these objects, which, since he had read the sacred books in his dream, meant many things to him. He hardly dared to touch them. He began to read the first chapters of the Gospel of St. John, which had always fascinated him; he had, moreover, penetrated its most secret keys.

He detached himself from it when he heard light footsteps behind him. It was the master, who smiled. He had recently entered the room, behind him the door was closed. He wore a long linen tunic – the protective fabric of any initiation ceremony – down to his feet. Around his neck, there was the magic symbol of the Order, in silver, hung at the end of a chain fromTemplar knots. With his hands gloved in white, his head bare, he approached, and without ceasing to smiled, placed a hand on Angelo’s right shoulder:

“Kneel, on your right knee only”.

Angelo obeyed, and the ceremony began.

The master gave the meaning of each object, explained their symbolism. He took sealed envelopes, opened them and read their contents. On a sheet of blue paper were the ancient regulations of the Order. He opened another envelope, handed the sheet of paper to Angelo, who read what it said: seven questions.

“Do you feel able to answer them?” the master asked him.

Angelo replied in the affirmative and gave him back the paper. Then with the help of a candle, master lit the candles of the second candelabra.

“These lights are for the masters of the past who are among us”.

He put incense in the censer, purified the room by its four corners: then he turned three times and at each turn waved it three times. He returned to the table, and placed his hands on the profane man’s head and began to speak. He told him the mysteries of the Order. He asked questions. He received answers. At last the old master bent over him.

“As you know, we call each other by the name we have chosen. Each one thus signs his freedom, his work program, the new link in the chain. What will your name be?”

The layman did not hesitate: “John.”

Here, we pause to consider the name that Angelo Roncalli chose for himself on being elected as Pope. It was John XXIII. That name had in fact been used once before: by an antipope in the fifteenth century. That John XXIII was eventually tried for  “piracy, rape, sodomy, murder and incest” with “the more scandalous” charges being “suppressed”!!

We continue our narrative, making note that the ‘peculiar and complex ritual’ is the great Secret of the Rosicrucians, something so depraved and unnatural that it cannot be mentioned outside of the brotherhood.

“John”, repeated the master. And he then undertook the peculiar and complex ritual of the initiation ceremony.

Finally, he put his sword on the neophyte’s head. At that moment, some new, elusive thing happened in John, something exploded in him. He was quite stunned and confused while reaching the height of serenity and happiness.

“What you are experiencing at this moment, Brother John, many others have experienced before You: Myself, the masters of the past, the other brothers around the world. That thing, call it Light, but it has no name”.

The master helped the disciple to his feet, kissed him seven times, and exchanged fraternal greetings with him. Then he taught him the secret words, the signs of recognition, the touching, the ritual of group work. Verbally, according to tradition.

He then taught him the daily rites to be performed at three very specific moments of the day — which correspond to the three points of the operation of the sun — and in the most great secret, a Greek sentence and gestures to repeat.

“At these three moments precisely,” explained the master, “our brothers and sisters all over the world make the same gestures, say the same sentence. Their strength is great, it comes from afar and is goes very far. Day after day, it acts on humanity.

Finally, the master took the last envelope, opened it, and read its contents to John. On a sheet of paper was inscribed the formula of the oath: an oath not to reveal the secrets of the Order, to follow tradition, to always act for good, to be always strong, to help the brethren and the unfortunate, to respect above all the law of God and his ministers.

Without hesitation, John signed at the end of the formula. He was animated by great strength. Near his signature, he wrote the number and the acronym that the master indicated to him. These two elements codified his initiation and rank. The master took the sheet back, folded it seven times, and asked the disciple to put it with the tip of his hand onto the flaming sword. This was done.

The master brought the sword close to the candelabra where it was burning the candles for the masters of the past; the fire licked the paper. In a few seconds, the Oath was taken, reduced to ashes which the master scattered. “You have sworn, John, but know that the freedom of the brothers is far superior to all oaths. Today, you really know what freedom is. He kissed him again. John began to cry.

The last consideration I will present here is that even if the described events did not not involve Angelo Roncalli, they do offer us an insight into the diabolical world of the mystery religions. We catch a glimpse of the mindset of those involved: their disdain for true religion, their arrogance in believing that the occult offers a solution to life’s problems that is superior to that of Our Lord Jesus Christ, Who is the Way, Truth and the Life.

IMAGE CREDIT: Abzeronow, CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

The Anti-Marian Current at Vatican II

It is widely acknowledged among traditionalists that the Second Vatican Council contained many elements which were designed to appease non-Catholics. This is most obvious in the changes which were later made to the Mass and the failure to condemn Communism at the time of the Council itself. However this non-Catholic appeasement also worked in an extraordinary way against devotion to the Mother of God, who was in many ways directly insulted by the progressive Council Fathers.

While the main reason for this was the all-pervading Masonic ecumenism of the Council, two lesser motives were also at work. One of these is a Modernist trend toward denigrating miracles. Modernists do not mind acknowledging Our Lady as an historical fact; after all, there is little doubt that She was a real person who existed in time and gave birth to Jesus Christ. Other religions and cults also venerate the mother of their prophets. But Modernists are less tolerant of miracles associated with Our Lady: Her apparitions, Her messages and especially Her appearance at Fatima.

A second factor at play is the significance placed on the female type by occultists. The ‘Sacred Feminine’ is important to the Rosicrucians, for example, where Our Lady is blasphemously referred to as one of the ‘Great Women Initiates.’ The Pachamama incident at the Amazon Synod was another reference to this female type. Pachamama is a version of Gaia, the earth goddess, who is venerated by Wiccans and climate worshippers as well as by tribalist pagan cults.

These motives led the progressive element among the Council Fathers to downplay or ‘cancel’ the Mother of God in three main ways. The first was in regard to the proclamation of Our Lady as Mediatrix. There had been a movement among orthodox prelates to have the Mother of God honoured by the proclamation of the Fifth Marian dogma: that She is Mediatrix of all Graces. Many bishops and countless faithful were optimistic that this would be proclaimed by John XXIII at the Council, but the good bishops’ campaign was thwarted at every opportunity. Petitions in favour of the proclamation were not delivered to the correct authorities and speeches bordering on blasphemy against Our Lady were delivered during Council sessions.

The second insult was in regard to Fatima. Readers will recall that the Virgin Mary, through her messenger, Sr. Lucia of Fatima, asked that the Third Secret be revealed by the year 1960, that is, at the latest, under the pontificate of Pope John XXIII. It is known that John read the Secret in August 1959 by which time, preparations for the Council were well underway. After reading the message from Our Lady, John stated, “This does not concern the years of my pontificate.”

These are remarkable words, considering that several sources claim the Secret refers to an evil Council! It is worth remembering that the convening of an ‘evil Council’ was also among the predictions made by the occultist and Synarchist, the false priest Roca.

Even if the Secret contained no reference to a Council, John deliberately disobeyed the Mother of God by failing to make its details public. He further added to the disobedience by failing to consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart and formally promulgate First Saturday devotions.

To further disrespect Our Lady, Pope John insulted Her in his Opening Speech to the Council in October 1962. The speech, which had heavy input from Cardinal Montini, the future Paul VI, contrasted John’s highly optimistic aggiornamento with the attitude of the so-called ‘prophets of doom’. This was a clear reference to the children of Fatima who carried Our Lady’s message, as well as to those conservative bishops and Cardinals who were concerned about threats to the Church and to the world at large. John XXIII criticised those who dwelled on ‘ruin and calamity’, echoing the words of the Fatima seers who saw in a vision that ‘the Holy Father crossed a large city half in ruins.’

The insults to Our Lady did not end there, however. The final part of the campaign to denigrate the Mother of God was the denial of the dangers of Communism. It is well-documented that John XXIII made a secret pact with the Communist-run Russian Orthodox Church prior to the Council. John, always anxious to boost his ecumenical credentials, wanted Russian Orthodox ‘observers’ at Vatican II. The Orthodox agreed – but only on condition that there was no condemnation of Communism from the Council. Encouraged by Montini, John went even further, ensuring there was no mention of Communism at all, despite many petitions from the prelates present.

As the Abbe de Nantes wrote, “The greatest Council of all time (supposedly) would therefore remain deaf and blind to the greatest phenomenon of inhumanity of all time: the global expansion of Bolshevism. Thus did it secretly lend its aid.”

Once Montini was elected Pope after the death of John XXIII, this anti-Mary agenda became even more clear. Throughout 1964 particularly, there were many attempts by the more conservative prelates to have Russia consecrated to the Immaculate Heart in the presence of all the world’s bishops. There could have been no better time for such an event as the Bishops were already gathered in Rome for the Council’s next session.

But instead of taking the opportunity to consecrate Russia while all the world’s bishops were present, Paul VI ignored the pleas of the hundreds of Bishops who heeded Our Lady’s warnings. By the end of 1964, however, as Pope Paul could see the damage already being wrought by his reckless Council, he made one small concession: Paul ‘recalled’ the Consecration made by Pius XII in 1942, while declaring Our Lady “Mother of the Church”.

Of course, this feeble response could in no way be said to fulfil the requests made by Our Lady at Fatima.

So it was that Popes John and Paul presided over a Council during which there was a concerted effort to insult, disrespect and denigrate the Mother of God. By refusing to condemn atheistic Communism, the Progressive Popes took the insult even further by refusing to acknowledge the greatest danger posed to the world, one which had precipitated a Divine visitation to earth in the form of the apparitions of Our Lady at Fatima.

REFERENCES:

“vatican council II and the fatima revelations” by the Contre Reforme Catholique

Timely Reflections on the Third Secret | The Fatima Center

The Whole Truth about Fatima – Vol III (click here to purchase)

IMAGES: Lothar Wolleh, CC BY-SA 3.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0, via Wikimedia Commons; https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/95/Our_Lady_of_Fatima_1968.jpg

Rampolla: Worse than a Freemason

The figure of Cardinal Mariano Rampolla is well known among those who take an interest in the inner workings of the Roman Curia, especially in events surrounding papal conclaves. He was famously very close to being elected Pope after the death of Pope Leo XIII in 1903, when he was vetoed on behalf of the Austro-Hungarian Empire.

At that time, only three nations retained that ancient power of veto: Austria, Germany and Italy. Even so, Emperor Franz Joseph had been reluctant to intervene in such a solemn matter. He had no choice, however, once presented with evidence that Rampolla was at least associated with Masonry, if not a fully-fledged Freemason himself.

The evidence came from Monsignor Jouin, founder of the International Review of Secret Societies; a priest who dedicated his life to exposing Masonry and its associated ideology. It is said he went first to the Cardinals, but was ignored and so he took his evidence instead to the Emperor.This led to the saintly Pius X being elected instead of Rampolla.

There have been attempts to play down the role of Cardinal Mariano Rampolla in this matter: written histories vary as to the reason behind the veto, with some historians, even Catholic ones, concluding that the intervention was merely political. Some go so far as to accuse the Emperor of vengeance: after son had tragically died, apparently by his own hand, it is said that Rampolla denied the boy a Christian burial.

However, after Rampolla’s death in 1913, hard evidence implicating him in Masonry was discovered by the Curia. Papers confirming his membership were shown the Pope Pius X, who ordered them burned, ostensibly to protect the reputation of this ghastly man. Surely no favours were done to the Church or to the faith of Her members by covering up Rampolla’s true allegiances. Ecclesiastical Freemasonry in the Curia has only flourished from that point forward.

In 1929, Rampolla’s betrayal was corroborated by a Bishop Marty in an interview with Felix Lacointa of the newspaper, The Anti-Revolutionary Bloc. Bishop Marty stated that he had been told by Cardinal Merry dal Val, Secretary of Sate to Pius X that the Pope had indeed viewed and then destroyed the incriminating papers. [Cited in L’Église Éclipsée by Georges Vinson.]

What makes Rampolla’s case even more serious is that the specific cult in which he was involved was the Ordo Templi Orientis or OTO. This cult is a blend of Masonry and Rosicrucianism, with a strong focus on magic and Rampolla is said to have achieved a very high status. While a man may join Masonry without fully realising what he is doing, the same cannot be said about the OTO. It is possible to potentially complete multiple rituals and levels in Masonry without understanding that one in fact giving one’s allegiance to Satan, believing that one is simply doing one’s best to be a good person by acknowledging God, albeit in the vaguest sense possible.

However, the OTO is something different. It is only approached by those who have a keen desire to access hidden knowledge and the powers that go with that.

There are several different routes into OTO initiation. Some first complete all the levels available at their local Masonic Lodge, finding that they still ‘want more’. Others complete several levels of Freemasonry then pivot to follow the seductive promises of magic, alchemy and power that are promised by the OTO and similar groups. Still others, knowingly rejecting the True God from the beginning, pursue from the beginning the rituals that promise them wealth, sex and power in this world, even while damning them in the next. Notably, the OTO has always been seen by Freemasons as something “irregular” and it has received many condemnations from within Masonry, particularly of the OTO’s homosexual rituals.

So what is the OTO and why is it so dangerous, yet so alluring to fallen human beings? Looking at one well-known member, Aleister Crowley, will shed some light on those questions. Crowley was among the OTO’s adherents at the end on the 19th century, eventually becoming a Grand Master. He publicly flaunted his immoral antics and invented some of his own rituals centred around sex magick.

It is perhaps this aspect for which he is most infamous. It was possibly Crowley, moreso than any other individual, who helped to make spell-casting, sexual deviancy and even satanism mainstream, to the point where, in our days, occult rituals at rock concerts and Olympic opening ceremonies are commonplace.

The sexual deviancy promoted by Crowley needs little explanation. It has saturated our culture to the point where its practitioners are a protected class. Even the diabolical Alfred Kinsey, the man responsible for deceiving millions of Westerners into accepting deviancy with his disgusting sexual experimentation on children, and even babies was a protege of Crowley’s.

Since sex-magick is integral to the OTO rituals, this means that Rampolla almost certainly engaged in such rituals. We can only wonder at how great a role he may have played in introducing rampant clerical homosexuality and pedophilia into the Church. ‘Uncle Ted’ McCarrick participated in sex-magick; Cardinals Bernadin and Murphy O’Connor were credibly accused of ritual sex abuse. The writings of Cardinal Tucho Fernandez are replete with sexual occultism and Rupnik is obviously into spiritualised sexual abuse.

When it comes to Rampolla, Crowley and McCarrick, though, there another link tying them to technocracy and the Synarchists: they all spent time in Switzerland. Crowley admitted to first dabbling with alchemy during a trip to Switzerland – a hotspot for the occult and the New World Order ‘elite.’ McCarrick is known to have spent many vacations at St. Gallen, which was also the birthplace of the notorious ‘St. Gallen Mafia’, those unworthy Cardinals who conspired to have Bergoglio elected to the papacy. Rampolla also vacationed in Switzerland, where, according to Felix Lacointa of The Anti-Revolutionary Bloc, that he regularly attended lodges in both Einsiedeln and Zurich.

Felix Lacointa provides the testimony of an unnamed French priest who, when on pilgrimage at Einsiedeln Abbey, was so impressed by Rampolla that he decided to write a favourable report on the conversations he had with the pilgrims. An Einsiedeln bookseller quickly brought him back to earth: “He is not worth it! Every fortnight he goes to the lodge in Zurich!”

Einsiedeln and St. Gallen are only a short distance from each other by car, and each is almost equidistant from Davos, the regular gathering spot for the world’s technocrats, many of whom are part of their own diabolical and esoteric group, Synarchy. Like members of the OTO (and it must be remembered, many of these occult groups overlap in both philosophy and membership), Synarchists access ‘secret knowledge’ from demons which they use to steer the world toward total enslavement to science and rationalism. All three sites are close to Zurich, as well as Lucerne, known as a centre of the OTO in the early twentieth century.

Our knowledge of Rampolla’s alleged attendance at lodges in Switzerland, and his founding of a lodge for ecclesiastics within the walls of the Vatican is confirmed by the occultist (and apostate priest) Roca. Roca moved in circles with Saint-Alveydre, Eliphas Levi and other like-minded magicians. Roca and others stated that Rampolla set up an ecclesiastical lodge within the Vatican, something the Marquis de la Franquerie claimed was recognised by St. Pius X. Roca also included the names of other Cardinals: Ferrata, Gasparri, Ceretti, Béa, and Liénart.

Tellingly, the name of this lodge is dedicated to St. John [either St. John the Baptist or St. John of Jerusalem] which was, of course, the name taken by Angelo Roncalli when he ascended to the papacy in 1958. St. John is apparently a “patron saint” of occultists, along with St. Michael the Archangel.

Rampolla’s name can still be found in registers compiled by members of the OTO. One website, to which I won’t link, lists his name among other famous members: Eliphas Levi, Nietzsche, Papus and Richard Wagner. The page seems to be reproduced from an OTO publication called The Equinox. That journal was once said to be highly confidential but that can hardly be the case now that it is freely available on the ‘net.

While there have been concerted efforts in the last few years to expose Rampolla’s involvement with an esoteric cult, the fact that he is known as a Freemason rather than as an occultist is intriguing. Freemasonry is often treated as a threat of the past and tolerated as no longer being seen as subversive. The result is that the word, “Freemasonry” has largely lost its meaning. Like “abortion” and “gay” the word no longer evokes an image of its true nature, indicating that the trend of describing Rampolla merely as a Mason might be part of the whitewash.

Cardinal Alfons Stickler once told a reputable monk that Annibale Bugnini was something “far worse than a Freemason.” One can only wonder what that was and whether Bugnini was merely following in the magical, alchemical footsteps of Mariano Rampolla.

One-Time
Monthly

PLease donate to help me create more content like this!
Make a one-time donation

Make a monthly donation

Choose an amount

A$5.00
A$15.00
A$100.00
A$5.00
A$15.00
A$100.00

Or enter a custom amount

A$

Your contribution is greatly appreciated!

Your contribution is appreciated.

DonateDonate monthly

As Above, So Below

This article will look at the principle quod est superius est sicut quod inferius, et quod inferius est sicut quod est superius, meaning “that which is above is like to that which is below, and that which is below is like to that which is above”, often shortened to “as above, so below”. It will also examine a gesture used by occultists which embodies the principle.

In his work, The Mystery of Iniquity, Pierre Virion states that the “as above, so below” principle is a false analogy which is at heart anti-Christic: “Illuminism and the theogony (stories of the gods) of the sects thus lead to an inversion of the data of revelation and consequently of Catholic theology.”

Thus transformation or regeneration is evil when it relies on occult means rather than on the graces flowing from Christ’s Redemption. For the proud occultist, however, transformation and enlightenment without Jesus Christ are desired, and he believes they are achieved by the recognising and balancing of opposing forces.

This well-known image of the demon Baphomet comes from the 1856 book, Dogme et Rituel de la Haute Magie, Volume 2 by Éliphas Levi.

Levi, a French occultist of the 19th century, greatly influenced Saint-Yves d’Alveydre, the founder of Synarchy.

Levi’s depiction embodies the principle of duality, reconciling opposites such as light and dark, male and female, spiritual and material. Baphoment, known to traditional Catholics as the demon of fornication, is androgynous and holds its hands in opposing directions in the familiar “as above, so below” formation. One explanation of the gesture is that it “signifies the flow of spiritual knowledge and the grounding of that knowledge in the material world.” The occultist believes that by using this gesture he can balance the opposing forces surrounding him.

A detail from the Redemptoris Mater chapel, created by the disgraced artist, Fr. Marco Rupnik. Christ is depicted with hands in the “as above, so below” configuration. Pope John Paul II can be seen in the background.

The principle of duality is found in a number of occult traditions such as Hermeticism and Kabbalism. In Hermeticism, the “as above, so below” represents the macrocosm (the universe) reflecting the microcosm (the individual). The Kabbalah applies a similar meaning, using the dualistic principle of the Macroprosopus and the Microprosopus (the great world and the small world). In Alchemy, this duality represents transformation, both of base metal into a precious metal and of man through spiritual enlightenment.

The characteristics of the god Baphomet with his up-down” gesture are said to be shared by the god, Baal. Baal is known as the demon responsible for promoting abortions.

This link is an interesting one given the video compilation shown in the Tweet below. In it, one finds the ultra-pro-abort Kamala Harris repeating variations of a specific phrase, accompanied by the “as above, so below” hand gesture. Harris’ gestures and repetition of the phrase, “what can be, unburdened by what has been”, are reminiscent of a witch performing an incantation.

The principle of “as above, so below” is also found in Freemasonry where it has particular significance. It refers to the presence of the Divine in both the spiritual and physical worlds and emphasises their interconnectedness. Masonry also includes the explicitly Hermetic idea that the spiritual realm is reflected in the physical realm and vice versa. Another application of the principle is found in the Masonic obligation of each human being to maintain balance and harmony, especially as expressed through Masonry’s tolerance of various creeds.

The “as above, so below” theme is found in three of Masonry’s integral symbols: the square and compass; the hexagram, also known as the Seal of Solomon; and Jacob’s Ladder.

This quote from a Freemason, explaining how Masonry’s rituals reference the “as above, so below” principle, point to a diabolical inversion of the Catholic Mass:

INFORMATION SOURCES:https://whowhatwhere.substack.com/p/hand-signals-of-baphomet-and-baal

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermeticism

Pierre Virion, La Mystere_iniquite

Esoteric Freemasons website

On the Square website

IMAGE SOURCES: Eliphas Levi, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Beyond My Ken, CC BY-SA 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Pblpitt, CC BY-SA 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

https://www.vatican.va/content/dam/vatican/virtualtour/redemptorismater/resources/tour-en.html