Tag: Homosexuality

At this point, if anyone thinks it is hyperbole to suggest that there exists a group of prelates who are involved in ritual s** abuse or at the very least, who are addicted to deviant s**, then they are beyond convincing. The evidence seems quite overwhelming.

This is not only because of the notorious abuser, Rupnik, and his uncanny knack for escaping punishment despite so many credible accusations. Nor is it because of Tucho Fernandez and the disgusting books he wrote before landing the top job at the DDF.

Marko Rupnik pictured with Archbishop Mark Coleridge at Our Lady of the Southern Cross in Springfield, Queensland, Australia. Rupnik is notoriously protected by Rome while his abhorrent works of art continue to disgrace many a church around the world, including here in Australia.

No, the idea of a formal group of deviant bishops, priests and even cardinals who are engaged in occult rituals, often involving s**, was suggested over a century ago when it became known that Cardinal Rampolla was a Mason. Not only that, but he was known to be involved with the OTO, a group for which ritual s** is its bread and butter. Since then, strange tales and mysterious events suggesting the existence of such a group within the Curia have popped up from time to time.

From “Windswept House“, and its shocking account of simultaneous Black Masses performed by high-ranking Catholic priests, to the disappearance of young girls within the Vatican walls, to the gay orgies and general air of sodomy prevalent among the hierarchy, there is no doubt that sinister forces have infiltrated the Curia’s ranks or that they are using the dark arts to further the reign of Satan. Even Fr. Gabriel Amorth – an exorcist but no great traditionalist – confirmed that Satanic Black Masses are in fact being held in the Vatican. And wherever one finds Black Masses, one finds deviant, ritual s**.

These men even arranged for children to be entertained by a drag queen at “world Children Day”!

The latest discovery which lends further credence to the existence of a s** cult in the Vatican comes from the highly informative blog, Pope Head. I have been following this Substack account for a while now, and have found it to be a good source for information relating to Masonry, especially its signs and symbols.

This recent article refers to one written at Pope Head some time ago; the original was a long post about an artist named Jago, who had created a sculpture of the late Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI. (Incidentally, I also wrote about it here.) Pope Head gave quite an examination of the artist in question, and found other works of his which are even more disturbing than his bust of the Pope: works with a theme of child s** abuse.

Before and after pictures of Jago’s sculpture, which is clearly meant as a message – an insult to Benedict or the mocking triumph after a stolen Conclave. The right-hand version, made after Benedict’s abdication, retains the Papal ring and most bizarrely, has been given a set of eyes, which were conspicuously missing from the original.

His latest article, though, asks a pertinent question: who exactly was it that commissioned the sculpture of Benedict XVI? (And the answer may well be given in the PAID section of the Pope Head blog.) It is known that someone in the Vatican commissioned it and, according to the Pope Head thesis, it looks suspiciously like that person or persons unknown had in mind Benedict’s resignation when the sculpture was first created.

Four years prior to Benedict announcing it to the world.

Two names are then mentioned by Pope Head: Cardinals Ravasi and Bertone. They jointly gave Jago an award for his original bust in 2009, so are obviously great fans of his work. (Pope Benedict himself did not care for it.)

Ravasi, as the reader may recall, is known for his “Letter to Brother Masons” reproduced here.

Bertone was once Secretary of State and was said to have been close to Benedict.

Pope Head suggests he is a Freemason (Well, he DOES have a collection of black and white scarves) who helped Bergoglio gain power and who may have been responsible for Vigano’s “sideways promotion” away from the Vatican Bank. Indeed, Bertone is singled out for blame in Archbishop Vigono’s latest missive on his accusation of schism.

Bertone was also accused of helping himself to large amounts of Vatican funds and, according to Pope Head, is all round, a “terrifying” figure.

Not only that, he actually met Sr. Lucia of Fatima on three occasions, then went on to – how shall we put it – slightly change the Third Secret, something none of us would want on their conscience at our particular judgement.

One of Jago’s earlier pieces, said to be his own hand. Erm, does that look like a BITE MARK on the index finger?

Could Ravasi and Bertone have been the ones to commission Jago’s bust of Pope Benedict AND were they responsible for forcing Benedict’s resignation?

If not they, then what Vatican official chose an artist who (at least later on) is so obsessed by the r**ing of children that he sculpts artwork using that theme? Even Jago’s relatively normal works contain some abnormal element. (See his hand, above.) The man is simply not balanced.

But then, “balanced” is not not a word that could be used to describe the Curia under the Bergoglio pontificate. Rather, it is regime marked by sexual perversion, narcissism and diabolical disorientation.

And, incidentally, those are all the ingredients necessary for a thriving culture of ritual coupling.