Many traditionalists and conservative Catholics have been asking themselves how it could be possible that Cardinals as diverse as the arch-heretics Hollerich, the ultra-orthodox Burke and the so-called ‘centrist’ Timothy Dolan, could all come away from a decisive conclave in complete agreement over the outcome. They all seem both satisfied and confident.
Even the unholy gay priestesses featured in another article on this site like the new guy and they picked up something about the Pope Leo which others, including me, had missed.
Indeed, an outcome which pleases the likes of Bishops Strickland and Fr. James Martin is quite remarkable. Until recent years, the possibility of such an outcome was almost non-existent – barring a mass conversion of dissidents to true Catholicism. This was due to the inherent unity of Catholic doctrine which ensures that a papal candidate who deviates from that doctrine – or upholds it – should be upsetting someone. “For there shall be from henceforth five in one house divided: three against two, and two against three (Lk 12: 52),” said Our Lord. This is division, not for its own sake but as a consequence of the inability of truth and error to coexist.
Thanks to the acceleration of revolutionary error under Pope Francis, however, the possibility of a consensus among polarised Catholic groups has presented itself and has seemingly materialised with the election of Pope Leo XIV. The mechanism for the change is one of the long-held goals of Vatican II: what is now known as ‘Synodality’.
Pope Leo at his installation, carrying the hideous ferula topped by the Scorzelli cross, used by his predecessors. See more here.
Synodality
Prevost spoke about Synodality on a number of occasions prior to his election as Pope. For instance, in 2024 he said:
“One of the risks of that is that we miss the presence of the Holy Spirit. That breeze that may go by that says, ‘Yeah you always did it that way, and maybe for six centuries it was wonderful, but maybe it’s time to change. Maybe it’s time to look at things differently.’”
The dissident Cardinal Hollerich explained Prevost’s point of view in his interview with Avenire:
“Pope Leo spoke of a “Synodal Church ” in his first message. Having participated in the work of the Synod, we have a Pontiff who knows synodality, who understands synodality, who dares synodality. There will be no revolution that nobody wants in the Church, but instead an evolution. And that’s the best way to change.”
There we have it: an evolution and not a revolution, according to Hollerich.
He goes on to outline the Hegelian paradigm that is at play here, describing Leo XIV as a synthesis of Bergoglio and Ratzinger before him; a man who has something to offer traditionalists yet something also for radicals and revolutionaries. He adds that “Synodality is inherent in the Church”, confirming the prediction of anti-Catholic extremists prior to the election of Francis who said that “after four years of Francis, nothing will be the same.”
Cardinal Tagle repeated the same prediction about Prevost almost verbatim at a press conference after the conclave. “Now, will the programs be clones or photocopies? The programs may evolve, and they may take different expressions. But there’s no turning back from that.”
Fiducia Supplicans
Speaking specifically on the encyclical, Fiducia Supplicans, which allows blessings for same-sex couples, Hollerich opines that Leo may reinterpret it but that he won’t abolish it. Prevost’s comments from October 2024 see to confirm this.
Cultural differences may be one of the reasons why “each episcopal conference needs to have a certain authority, in terms of saying, ‘how are we going to understand this in the concrete reality in which we’re living,?’” he told a press briefing at the sidelines of the synod.
“The bishops in the episcopal conferences of Africa were basically saying, that here in Africa, our whole cultural reality is very different … it wasn’t rejecting the teaching authority of Rome, it was saying that our cultural situation is such that the application of this document is just not going to work.
“You have to remember there are still places in Africa that apply the death penalty, for example, for people who are living in a homosexual relationship … So, we’re in very different worlds.”
Prevost is not known ever to have rejected or criticised Fiducia Supplicans himself which indicates that he is personally in favour of blessings for same-sex couples. According to the principle of Sunodlaity (which, remember, is not a Catholic principle), bishops are free to apply or not apply FS as they see fit.
Under the new Pope, we should expect to see FS being implemented where a bishop is liberal and being denounced where a bishop is orthodox in the name of ‘Synodality.’
Traditional Latin Mass
Similarly, we should expect the TLM to be widely available in some diocese yet severely limited in others. It doesn’t appear that Prevost is willing to tarnish the image of his predecessor, Francis, in any way. This means that it’s unlikely that Traditiones Custodes will be rescinded – unless this was part of a deal carved out with traditional Cardinals during the conclave in exchange for votes.
Pope Leo’s first Mass was a Novus Ordo in Latin, which is perhaps a metaphor for what is to come: a dressing-up of error in the trappings of tradition. This indicates Prevost has no intention of getting to the heart of the problem, which is the Modernism that has infected the Church thanks to the Council.
An unholy Spirit
If the spirit of Synodality is alive and well in the Vatican, then so, apparently is the spirit of Francis. This may be the most unsettling thing that has come from the new Pope yet:
Pope after Mass at Regina Coeli: “During Mass I strongly felt the spiritual presence of Pope Francis accompanying us from heaven.” pic.twitter.com/g2vHWkxucs
Beware of false prophets, who come to you in the clothing of sheep, but inwardly they are ravening wolves – Matthew 7:15.
Some may think that the election of yet another unworthy Cardinal to the Papacy causes perverse delight for writers who routinely expose wrongdoing in the Church. Nothing could be further from the truth! It is actually a source of pain to be counted among the minority who disregards popular opinion in order to defend the rights of God.
It was Christ Himself who warned us to be on the watch for dangerous men who like to appear as one thing, while having intentions that are altogether different. Our Lord even specifically warned that such men will dress the part in order to lead His unsuspecting sheep astray.
This profile of a ravenous wolf perfectly fits the latest Pontiff, Leo XIV, who has chosen to adopt the outward persona of a traditionalist, all the way from his heavily embroidered pallium down to his relic-embedded pectoral cross.
He is gaining favour with Trads, as stories of him offering private Latin Masses are doing the rounds of social media. Those posts are often accompanied by a photograph, shown below, of then-Cardinal Prevost wearing traditional vestments. However, the liturgical event was not a traditional Mass; rather Prevost was simply incensing an image of Our Lady, possibly the miraculous icon at Gennazzo. [We know it wasn’t a Mass because the altar is covered, and there are no altar cards, vessels or missal.]
Prevost NOT offering a TLM.
So what is underneath the lovely vestments and fluent Latin that should have us so concerned? It is that Prevost is a Modernist, through and through, and that he a stated goal of picking up where Francis left off, steering the Barque of Peter firmly along a course of Synodality.
The Catholic Esquire has done a great job of explaining succinctly the programme of this papacy and how it is in perfect continuity with that of Francis – and of the entire Revolution. [His short (17min) video can be found here.]
In short, Synodality is the name of the game: decentralising the Church in an attempt to obliterate the foundation of Her unchanging doctrinal authority. Now, obviously, this plan can never ultimately succeed, as Christ is that foundation, but the Synodalists have and will continue to inflict great damage on the Church in their attempt.
We should expect to see national bishops’ conferences implementing their own local brand of Catholicism whilst tolerating all manner of error. We can also expect some tinkering with the Novus Ordo liturgy, as Synodalists move along in their efforts to further delegitimise, and one day completely invalidate that form.
The persecution of Traditional Catholics could perhaps appear to soften, but in no way should a return to the widespread traditional practice of the Faith be expected. Should Traditiones Custodes be revoked, then Traditional Catholics must not let down their guard. If a convincing wolf is in charge, then we must not stand near him saying “what big teeth you have!”
As explained in my last article, we also should not expect to see a cleansing of sodomites from the ranks of the hierarchy under this pontificate. The moral chaos and errors are very likely to increase, rather than diminish. And that means an increase of moral chaos in the wider society as well.
What about Ecclesiastical Freemasonry? Will Pope Leo denounce Masonry in the strongest terms, like his namesake, Leo XIII? That is most unlikely. The best that can be hoped for is the reiteration – on paper, at least – of the Church’s longstanding condemnation as was produced by Tucho Fernandez under Bergoglio in November 2023. That ostensible condemnation was more likely aimed at disempowering the Masonic Old Guard in the Curia, led by then-papabile Cardinal Parolin, than at actually dissuading Catholics from becoming Masons. Francis’ Masonic credentials certainly suggest that this was the case.
Speaking of Masons, an intriguing image was posted on a Masonic Instagram account a few days after the death of Bergoglio. There’s no way of knowing what it meant, but the timing was most interesting. It was accompanied by a snippet of Masonic poetry, without any additional commentary. Note the red cuff on the figure of the Pope, as well as the (Rosicrucian-inspired?) equilateral crosses on his vestments.
From a Masonic Instagram account, posted April 26th, 2025. Pope Francis died April 21st and Leo XIV was elected on May 8th.
As with the election of other Popes since the Council, Freemasons have expressed their congratulations to the newest Pontiff. This was the only example that was easily found, but it is early days yet.
Pope Leo XIV welcomed by the Freemasons of Tanzania
The surest confirmation of Pope Leo’s agenda will be his selection of a new Curia, which won’t happen until after his official installation on May 18th. Some more Masonic well-wishing around that time is to also be expected.
So is there reason for us to be disoriented? Or disillusioned …. depressed? Well, no. All of this has to play out before the time of Our Lady’s Triumph.
Since the majority of Catholics, including a series of Popes, has refused to honour the requests of Our Lady at Fatima and elsewhere, another destructive papacy is simply part of the package.
However, we are not powerless in the face of adversity. In fact, there is much we can do to mitigate the effects of another ‘worm-ridden’ papacy. The following Rules of Engagement with the revolutionary forces – both natural and supernatural – may be of assistance:
A renewed commitment to daily prayer, especially the Holy Rosary
A commitment to a small form of daily penance for Pope Leo XIV, that God will work much good through his pontificate (and even a conversion can’t be ruled out)
A commitment to limiting online criticism to the actions of the new pope, while being careful not to demean his office
Similarly, great care should be taken always to distinguish between the human element of the Church and Her Divine origin. {For example, as clearly stated by Pope Gregory XVI in Mirari Vos: “To use the words of the fathers of Trent, it is certain that the Church “was instructed by Jesus Christ and His Apostles and that all truth was daily taught it by the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.” Therefore, it is obviously absurd and injurious to propose a certain “restoration and regeneration” for her as though necessary for her safety and growth, as if she could be considered subject to defect or obscuration or other misfortune.“]
Asking heaven for the grace to remain on the Ark; to stay within His Church, no matter how bad things get.
PS. It is well-known that Hollywood and the celeb-world are in cahoots with the revolution everywhere – including within the Church.
Does anyone else think this costume worn by Whoopi Goldberg at the recent Met Gala refers to an ecclesiastical wolf in sheep”s clothing? The furry-looking overcoat seems to peel away, revealing a sombre, even militaristic suit beneath. The bottom of the suit is even more surprising, as it is buttoned all the way down, just like a cassock.
To top it off, the brooch on her lapel is in the shape of a key-hole. Food for thought….
That was all we needed to hear to know that the Cardinals have just elected Francis II. Sure, he might speak Latin beautifully and he might be great at football and his papal name – Pope Leo XIV – sounds quite hopeful.
But Cardinal Robert Prevost is no traditionalist, nor even a conservative when it comes to the things that really count. He is fully committed to “Synodality”, open border migration and LGBT rights. That last one is the most concerning of all, because it means that the moral current flowing through the Vatican will remain contaminated for years to come.
Prevost is such a big hit with the gay Mafia that, prior to the Conclave, conservative news outlets were accused of running a campaign against him. If, by campaign, one means revealing Provost’s ties with sexual abuse cover-ups, then that is certainly true. The arch-Liberal journalist, Austen Ivereigh, was said to be nervous that damning evidence about Prevost was being released so close to the voting, but he need not have feared. As InfoVaticana explains, “Prevost was their man, the candidate in whom they had placed all their hopes.”
The College of Cardinal website provides more details on our new Pope: “views close to Pope Francis”; prefect of the Dicastery for Bishops; “very close to Francis’ vision regarding the environment, outreach to the poor and migrants, and meeting people where they are”; with his views on the blessing of same-sex couples being uncertain:
Although he expressed reservations about “sympathy for beliefs and practices that contradict the gospel,” Cardinal Prevost showed less clarity about Fiducia supplicans, stressing the need for national bishops’ conferences to have doctrinal authority to interpret and apply such directives in their local contexts, given cultural differences. He therefore did not fully endorse nor reject the document.
In her recent article calling for the next Pope to expel homosexualism from the ranks of the clergy, Dr. Janet Smith specifically mentioned Robert Prevost as one of those who was highly suspect:
It is impossible to estimate how many of the cardinals participating in the conclave have either been accused of being active homosexuals or of covering up for homosexuals. SNAP (The Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests) submitted to Cardinal Parolin a list of six of the papabile cardinals who have “either enabled or concealed sexual abuse committed by Catholic Clergy”: Péter Erdő from Hungary, Kevin Farrell from the United States, Victor Manuel Fernández from Argentina, Mario Grech from Malta, Robert Francis Prevost from the United States, and Luis Antonio Tagle from the Philippines. A rainbow cloud hangs over the heads of the cardinals from the United States, either for their own suspected homosexual activities or for cover-up of abusive homosexual priests. [emphasis added]
Prevost’s pro-life and other conservative-sounding quotes are already being circulated in the jubilant post-conclave atmosphere. Links are being fabricated between Leo XIV and the lion-hearted Leo XIII, connections made with the date of Prevost’s election (a lesser-known feast of St. Michael) and that mighty angelic defender of the Church.
While it is always possible that the graces of state may kick in and Prevost could surprise everyone by imitating St. Michael or embodying another Leo XIII, at this point in history it is far more likely that Christ and His Church are being mocked yet again by occultists and sex-magicians who have co-opted St. Michael – and Leo XIII – for their own ends.
So pray for the new Pope, as is the obligation of every Catholic. Offer prayers for him at every Mass – if only to gain indulgences for the souls in purgatory – but don’t expect a ‘new springtime’ in the near future. Put your head down, ignore the papal propaganda and work out your salvation in fear and trembling.
It is being widely reported that the Italian Grand Lodge has released a very positive farewell statement after the passing of Pope Francis, entitled, “Francis, the Pope of the Least”. (Reproduced below)
This is, of course, no great surprise considering how closely Bergoglio followed the pattern set down by the Masons in the Alta Vendita almost two hundred years ago: “…a Pope according to our needs…” During his life, Masons regularly thanked Bergoglio for his contribution to their aims. In fact, most of his programme, from Synodality to his new-fangled mortal sins, were completely in line with Masonic principles.
What is a surprise is how few realise that this appreciation is just standard fare for the Masons in regard to the conciliar popes. For example,
In June 1963, Mexican Freemasons glowingly farewelled Pope John XXIII 1
After the death of Paul VI, French and Italian Masons spoke of him favourably 2
“To us, it is the death of him who made the condemnation of Clement XII and of his successors fall. That is, it is the first time – in the history of modern Freemasonry – that the Head of the greatest Western religion dies not in a state of hostility with the Freemasons.”
During his life, John Paul II was granted an award for his dedication to promoting human fraternity by Portuguese Masons – he declined it, however.3
Australian Freemasons also honoured John Paul II for his leadership qualities4:
“John Paul II’s most outstanding leadership quality was his ability to create real presence in those who looked to him. The capacity for a leader to make those who follow them believe that the person to whom they aspire can understand, listen and comfort them in a manner that is enriching; is a quality not to be underestimated.” (Note the reference to the Real Presence – remember Masons prize mocking God above all!)
Sometimes the praise went in the other direction, for example when John Paul I praised a Mason, who was also known to be a satanist! (Read the article here.)
Now for the latest praise of a post-conciliar Pope by the Masons: a statement on the death of Francis from the Grand Lodge of Italy. The Mason’s mention of Bergoglio’s “path free from dogmas” is perhaps ironic given how dogmatic he was in regard to eliminating tradition.
Francis the Pope of the least
The Grand Lodge of Italy of the ALAM joins the universal condolences for the disappearance of Pope Francis, a pastor who, with his magisterium and his life, has embodied the values of brotherhood, humility and the search for planetary humanism .
The Grand Lodge of Italy of the Ancients, Free, Accepted Masons joins the universal condolences for the passing of Pope Francis, a shepherd who, with his magisterium and his life, embodied the values of brotherhood, of humility and of the search for a planetary humanism. Coming from the “end of the world”, Jorge Mario Bergoglio has been able to change the Church, reporting the revolutionary teaching of St. Francis of Assisi to the topicality of history.
In this moment of mourning, our Communion intends to pay homage to the vision of Pope Francis, whose work is characterized by a profound resonance with the principles of Freemasonry: the centrality of the person, respect for the dignity of each individual, the construction of a community of solidarity, the pursuit of the common good. His encyclical Brothers all represents a manifesto. Freedom, Equality and Brotherhood it is the triple value asset of Freemasonry. Overcome divisions, ideologies, unique thinking to recognize the richness of differences and build a humanity united in diversity, this was ardently wanted by Francis, the same design pursued by the Grand Lodge of Italy.
Pope Francis has been able to combine faith and reason, complementary dimensions of human experience, renewing the Anselmian principle of “credo ut intelligam” (I believe so that I may understand). A faith capable of questioning itself, of welcoming doubt and of dialoguing, which we also find in the Masonic initiatory method, founded on a path free from dogmas, substantiated by incessant search for truth.
Francis’ pontificate placed in the center the last, together with the planet care and a an ethics of development based on human dignity. This too is found in the Masonic construction of the “Inner temple”, based on tolerance, solidarity and resistance against hatred and ignorance, and finds a profound correspondence in the pastoral care of Bergoglio, which with his “sweet revolution”, showed that humility and dialogue are instruments of authentic strength. In the wake of the “Francesco Economy ” and the vision of one “common home ”, there Masonry supports the commitment to a sustainable, fair and supportive future.
In this time crossed by serious critical issues, the Grand Lodge of Italy finds itself in Pope Francis’ appeal for a “planetary consciousness”, which recognizes humanity as one community of destiny. We honor his memory by continuing to work for an ethics of the limited, for respect for the other and for the construction of a temple based on solidarity, freedom of thought and universal brotherhood.
Luciano Romoli Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of Italy of the A.L.A.M. Rome, April 22, 2025
The following is taken from silere non possum. It has been translated into english using an online tool & edited slightly for clarity.
The Fraternity of Communion and Liberation for years, he has been experiencing a true and silent abuse by the Dicastery for the Laity, the Family and Life.
These are those offices of the Roman Curia which are led by Kevin Joseph Farrell, who lived in the same house as the abuser, Theodore Edgar McCarrick. Over the years, while McCarrick has been accused of performing the worst actions in his home, Farrel has been elevated to cardinal dignity and has been entrusted with crucial roles of the Roman Curia.
At the moment he is the cardinal who plays all the roles where the most reliable people are placed: Prefect of the Dicastery for the Laity, Family and Life, Camerlengo of the Holy Roman Church, President of the Commission of Confidential Matters, President of the Investment Committee and President of the Court of Cassation (Supreme Court) of the Vatican City State. It is good to remember that Kevin Joseph Farrell has never obtained any title in canon law or in economics.
Together with Farrell, as regards the Fraternity of Communion and Liberation, the ambitious Linda Ghisoni was in the front row, known in the sacred rooms for her desire for power.
Cardinal Kevin Farrell
To friends, todo, todo, todo
According to the motto of a great mentor of Francis, “Al amigo, todo; the Dicasteries of the Roman Curia and also the dioceses in the world govern the enemigo, for whom there is ni justicia ”.
As has been pointed out several times, law is being trampled on in the Church today and this is a serious problem. According to what is happening, it is now necessary to start questioning the States that recognize the judgments of the courts of the Holy See, of the diocesan courts and also of the Vatican City State. In fact, if a norm states something, the Pope always acts ‘notwithstanding’ that same text.
When the Apostolic Constitution Praedicate Evangelium was issued, everyone wondered how some rules would apply. Article 17, for example, provides: “§ 4. As a rule, after five years, clerical officers and members of Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life who have served in curial institutions and offices return to pastoral care in their Diocese / Eparchy, or in Institutes or Societies of belonging. If the Superiors of the Roman Curia deem it appropriate, the service can be extended for another period of five years “.
Cardinal Juan Luis Cipriani Thorne
In Santa Marta someone mumbled: “The extensions will be different and will always concern the most faithful”. It is the practice of this pontificate. Cardinal Cypriani is accused? He is guilty beyond reasonable doubt. The process? Never celebrated. The evidence? Never presented. The penalty? Already applied. (Cipriani admits he is under restrictions for abuse: see here.)
Oscar Zanchetta have you been sentenced with evidence and public trial?
“Yes, but he is the victim of a conspiracy,” the Pope said to his faithful collaborators. This is today’s modus operandi; the Argentine dictators to whom Francesco is inspired were fresh air in comparison.
Communion and Liberation
This system is also being repeated with regard to movements and associations, religious orders, societies of apostolic life, etc …These are real abuses of power by the ecclesiastical authority against the various realities. The fact that this happens in a historical moment such as the present one in which there are real attempts to eradicate the numerous abuses of conscience that are perpetrated against the weakest in the various communities around the world, is something very serious.
In the Church what happened in Caltanissetta is happening with the story, well known in Italy, which involved the judge Silvana Saguto. There, a system called “Mafia of Antimafia” was discovered, that is, the mafia was fought with an equally mafioso system. Another mafia, in essence. The same happens in the Church. Abuse is committed in the name of the fight against abuse. By abusing consciences and their power, it is claimed abuse of power is eliminated.
On June 3, 2021 the Dicastery signed a very important decree that it tries, not always successfully, to eliminate the ‘eternal mandates’ of the superiors of these ecclesial realities. In Article 1 it is written: “The mandates in the central government body at an international level can have a maximum duration of five years each “. Just as we will legislate about a year later on the Roman Curia.
In recent years, unfortunately, serious abuses of power have been committed in Communion and Liberation which have led most of the members of the Fraternity to close in a silence typical of those realities where abuse of conscience is committed. In his book “Crushing the Soul,” Father Dysmas De Lassus explains these dynamics perfectly. What has been repeated several times to Memores Domini, as regards their reality, and to the members of the Fraternity of Communion and Liberation, as regards their reality, was precisely to keep silent in obedience to the Pope.
Obedience to the Pope has become, since 2013, the balance on which to measure everything and everyone. Those who are victims of this system, however, unfortunately do not have the tools to understand that these are abuses of power, because those who act according to transparency and justice do not need to impose any silence because, even if information comes out, this should not worry them.
The Minister General of the Carthusian Order writes:
To this question is added another: what is the extension of the secret? If it extends to every person who comes from outside – family, friends, confessor etc. -, are you not setting up an isolation practice that has nothing to do with preserving inner life?If the discipline of secrecy is part of a pyramidal structure and a unique thought, a good part of the elements of a sectarian drift are put in place.
In fact, in a framework of this kind, members of the community who may have doubts no longer have the opportunity to compare them with someone else, neither inside, due to the pyramidal structure, nor outside, because of the secret.
Perhaps we are not trying to ward off any risk of dissent, what makes every totalitarian power?In practice, this type of drift translates into the interdiction to have external exchanges with people, in particular with the family or confessors, on everything related to community life and the personal life of the religious.
In the impossibility of explaining the real reasons for this prohibition, other more acceptable reasons are presented: the need to wash dirty clothes in the family or to keep family secrets, because “they would not understand us” or, also, the somewhat enigmatic word of Jesus: “Do not give holy things to dogs and do not throw your pearls in front of the pigs.” (Mt 7,6).
These precautions may have some good motivation, which makes it more difficult to discern the threshold beyond which a common sense recommendation becomes a gag. A little bit of discretion on the small defects of the brothers or sisters and on the small gossip of the community doesn’t hurt. But when it comes to a profound unease experienced by the religious or religious, preventing him from talking to external people means forcing him to close himself in his malaise and refuse him any chance of finding the light.
Prosperi reconfirmed
In spite of the decree mentioned above, Pope Francis on 1st February 2025 signed a letter prepared by Linda Ghisoni and Kevin Farrell. Although Article 3 provided that “All members pleno iure have an active, direct or indirect voice in the establishment of the bodies that elect the central government body at an international level”, the Pope is not interested in what he approved in 2021.
In the letter he writes: “I arrange that you, Professor Prosperi, remain at the helm of the Fraternity as President for a further five-year term, starting from the natural expiry of the mandate currently underway ».
But how, the mandates were not five years old? «This is, therefore, a very delicate and, of course, of great ferment in CL’s life for the achievement of that renewed and fundamental ecclesial maturity so much desired, which entails the full and faithful enhancement of his charism, remaining firmly anchored in the Church universal of Our Lord Jesus Christ » continues Francesco.
For years, therefore, the narration is the same: «CL members are idiots, they cannot elect and decide who should be at their helm, so we do it ».
This speech is the same that is re-proposed regarding those nations that elect candidates from the political party opposite to those related to the press and therefore the narrative is: “Brogli (electoral fraud) in the elections”. Francis acts in all respects in this way, according to those canons and practices which are typical of a certain political orientation.
In reality, this way of acting – however paternalistic and abusing – hides the flaws of a Dicastery that for years has tried in every way to manipulate the consciences of those belonging to this reality. Joseph Kevin Farrel and Linda Ghisoni have multiple times – we have audio recordings -slandered and defamed Fr Julián Carrón attributing to him actions or intentions that in reality have never even gone through his head. With this excuse, just as happened with Cardinal Cipriani and many others, the Spanish priest was ousted and sent out of government. Restrictions were even imposed on him for which Carrón himself went several times to the Pope to ask for explanations.
Recently Cardinal Fernandez reported that work is being done on legislating spiritual and conscientious abuse. Welcome but if the application of these rules is despotic and based on personal sentiment or political interests, perhaps it is not appropriate to add elements to those – very numerous – already present.
From vice to president
In 2021 Davide Prosperi had already been identified by the Dicastery as the right person to succeed Fr Julián Carrón. We must also reflect on these movements and ask ourselves what is happening.
The Holy Pontiff said: “You have to be at the top to be able to see and judge”. Far from feeling “top”, however, we try to climb the high summit in order to have an “overall vision” of what happens in the Catholic Church. It is emblematic that many of those realities that undergo, in fact, a commission, see the “vice” go to the helm of the community.
It happened in Community of Bose, which we talked about for a long time and highlighted the serious abuses committed by Pietro Parolin, Amedeo Cencini, Pietro Parolari and Anna Deodato,and it has happened in many other realities.
Also in Communion and Liberation. Prosperi, who had been appointed by Carrón as his deputy in 2011, was brought to the pedestal. In 2021 he wrote: “I have accepted the assignment that I hold as an act of obedience to the Holy Father and I wish to carry it out as a service to the life of our company and of each of you. As far as possible, I would like to listen to everyone and give space to the initiative of anyone who wants to collaborate. The witness task that God entrusts to us is great and, as Fr Julián reminded us in his last letter, at this particular moment everyone is called to take responsibility for the charism. I ask each of you to help me bring mine with an advance of trust and esteem ».
An internal source reported to Silere Non Possum:
They don’t actually listen to anyone. In the meetings it is often reiterated how one must “obey”, “answer the requests of the Holy See”.
Prosperi usually says: “The Pope wants”, “The Pope asked me”. This happens every time we also find ourselves in meetings with the leaders of the Dicastery. Everyone puts their ambitions in the Pope’s mouth and sells them as “the Pope’s will”. Francesco, however, is aware of it?
Do you know CL? Are you aware of what has been happening here for years? We are completely divided. They have created division and are aware that a reality like ours is difficult to “manipulate” because we almost all have a certain degree of education, important positions and we are also engaged in different areas of institutions. At the same time though, they manage to manipulate consciences with a few simple words “obedience to the Pope”.
We are all aware that in reality the Pope does not know much and the purpose of the Dicastery is to control a reality that has always been viewed with distrust. Prosperi is the right person to do it because, in the name of a candy that is currently the one of power, he is willing to sell the people who are part of it and also the movement, the charisma, the fraternity.
I was present on several occasions when the Gius [Don Luigi Giussani ed.] met Pope John Paul II. This was not what both wanted. We recently published a podcast in which it is possible to listen to Fr Giussani’s living voice speak of Jesus. Listen to him and you will understand why we followed him. We followed him because he spoke to us of Jesus in that way and made us fall in love with him.
It was bad enough that Papa Bergoglio would agree to meet with the Board of Directors of a pro-abortion NGO at the Vatican. The setting for the official photograph, however, takes this meeting to another level.
The Conrad N. Hilton Foundation is the largest funder of Catholic religious sisters around, has sent millions of dollars towards the formation and good works of Catholic sisters over the years. It also assists refugees, the poor and provides access to safe water – ostensibly one of its seven main goals. The Foundation also has an association with National Catholic Reporter which, due to its heterodox content, even US Bishops have claimed is ‘not really Catholic’.
That’s all well and good but the Hilton Foundation is also very pro-abortion. Among the many organisations the Foundation has helped financially are those dedicated to ‘reproductive health’ aka abortion and contraception, including the ‘California Latinas for Reproductive Justice.’ [see more here.]
California Latinas for Reproductive Justice
Pope Francis met with the Board of the Hilton Foundation on January 22 of this year. He of course told them how wonderful their work was, giving them some gems like “Compassion is not throwing money into the hands of another without looking them in the eyes.“Right. Be like McCarrick who looked the Popes right in the eyes as he threw them bucketloads of money.
What really caught my eye was the strange artwork hanging in the background of the official photograph of the occasion, which was circulated by the Vatican’s press office. Although not as aesthetically offensive as other artwork favoured by the Curia (thinking here of Rupnik and Jago) this one certainly is strange when you take a close look at it. And the fact that it was chosen as the backdrop to the photograph of Francis taken with abortion advocates and feminist nuns like Nathalie Berquart makes it even more stunning.
“Abbraccio Cosmico” by Camilian Demetrescu
“Abbraccio Cosmico” (Cosmic Embrace) is a tapestry created by by Camilian Demetrescu. Demetrescu was a Freemason-turned-Moslem who associated with Modernists, nihilists and Theosophists. His tapestry was installed in 2008, during the pontificate of Benedict XVI.
This tapestry has been made in Italy (Gallese) after the september 11th 2001 : the cosmic love (abbraccio cosmico) is the only response to such a tragedy. Two angels are moving the universe around the planets’ hug.
What he doesn’t explain is that this design is all about astrology, including cosmic portals and ‘as above, so below’ imagery as well as the fake New Age ‘angels’.
Below is one interpretation of the image that came from an occultist – not from the artist himself. [NOTE: This information came from a website called ‘Keys to Ascension’. I really don’t like linking directly to occult websites.]
The translation means “Cosmic Embrace.” The center of this painting is a man and woman1 in a tender embrace. This represents the Sacred Union of the Divine Feminine and Divine Masculine. Uniting the Heart and the Mind through Divine Cosmic Love – Christ Love!
Facing the picture, the Blue Angel on the left represents the Feminine/Universe/ Spirit. The Brown Angel on the right represents Masculine/Earth/Physicality. The Angels wings are pointing up and down. They are each holding a handle. One up – one down. As Above – So Below. The handles are connected to a shaft of Light that runs through the heart center of the Divine Cosmic Embrace. The EnLightened Ones are guiding the transition.
Notice also that the handle held by the Earth Angel is attached to a spiral – a Cosmic Portal. The handle held by the Cosmic Angel is attached to a symbol of the Cardinal Grand Cross2. Earth/Humanity goes through the Cosmic Portal to connect to the heart of Divine Source/Divine Unconditional Love – the Cosmic Embrace. The Cosmic Alignment funnels Light through Divine Source/Divine Unconditional Love to elevate Earth.
The Cosmic Portal envelopes the planets and humanity in a Divine embrace of Christ Consciousness. This is the birth of the New Age of EnLightenment!
Another interpreation explains that the two people embracing are ‘asexual.’ ↩︎
An astronomical formation which is highly significant in the practise of astrology. When a Cardinal Grand Cross occurs in the heavens, it is a ‘sacred day’ to many occultists. ↩︎
Ecclesiastical Freemasonry 