Tag: Pope Francis

Viganò Suggests Bertone is ‘Contiguous’ to Freemasonry

Published on by Kathy Clubb4 Comments

In his recent interview with Franca Giansoldati, Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò accuses Cardinal Tarscisio Bertone of having Masonic sympathies. Bertone, who is still alive, was Secretary of State to Benedict XVI and he continued in that position for the first seven months of Francis’ pontificate.

Like Pope John XXIII, Cardinal Bertone’s coat-of-arms includes a tower, which according to Masonic heraldry, represents the Masonic temple.

Bertone is widely regarded as one of Benedict’s ‘gatekeepers’, one who controlled the flow of information to the Pope; he admitted to knowing months in advance of the Pope’s decision to resign. Bertone’s farewell address to Benedict, flatters the Pope for his decision, even though elsewhere he said he did not agree with it:

“All of us have realized that it is precisely the deep love that Your Holiness has for God and the Church that prompted you to make this act, revealing that purity of mind, that strong and demanding faith, that strength of humility and meekness, along with great courage, that have marked every step of your life and your ministry…”

Cardinal Bertone’s Farewell Address to the Holy Father

According to Viganò, it was Bertone who exerted pressure on Pope Benedict to have Viganò removed from the Secretariat of State and subsequently transferred to the US as Nuncio. All of this was aimed at stopping Viganò from exposing financial corruption in the Vatican. Viganò was also abruptly evicted from his Curial home the day he turned 75, and denied an alternative within the Vatican walls.

Alarmingly, he suggests that his predecessor as Nuncio, Cardinal Pietro Sandri, was murdered for opposing then-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick.

Said Viganò:

Archbishop Sambi died in circumstances that have never been clarified, after a trivial operation at John’s Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore (which is connected to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum in Davos). McCarrick disappeared for a month in 2011 – simultaneous to the death of the Nuncio – and did not attend his funeral. The death certificate issued to Msgr. Jean-François Lanteaume, Chargé d’Affaires at the Nunciature, did not explain the causes of the Nuncio’s death, nor was an autopsy ever carried out on Archbishop Sambi.

So, what is known about Bertone and does he have Masonic form?

Bertone’s unusual handshake – SOURCE: Freemasonry Watch

We know that he was part of the ‘Old Guard’: that ‘mafia’ of prelates at the highest levels in the Vatican, who ran things behind the scenes before Bergoglio’s new gang came to town. Parolin is one of these, as was Sodano.

Bertone was responsible for making influential appointments within the Curia, the most notable of which was Cardinal Becciu’s appointment as sostituto in 2011. He also appointed Alberto Perlasca as head of the administrative office of the Secretariat of State in 2009. Perlasca monitored all the department’s financial transactions – including the ill-fated London Sloane Avenue deal and both he and Becciu went on to become central figures in the Vatican financial corruption trial.

Bertone himself is no stranger to accusations of financial misappropriation. In 2015, he was at the centre of the Vatileaks 2 scandal when it was revealed that he had used funds from the Bambino Gesù Foundation to renovate his large apartment in Vatican City. The apartment was apparently designed to house Bertone, his secretary and three nuns and included a rooftop entertainment area; half a million US dollars was diverted from the Bambino Gesù to pay for the renovations. In addition, there was corruption involved in the tendering process and a long-time friend of Bertone was given the contract for the job.

Although the case was mentioned in 2017 during the complicated Vatican finances trial, no charges were laid against Bertone, nor was he even called as a witness – Bertone repeatedly has claimed that Pope Francis sanctioned the renovations. The only conclusion given at the trial was that the Bertone affair was ‘anomalous.’

Yet that event pales into insignificance with older accusations that Bertone was involved in a misappropriation of Vatican funds to the tune of USD $15 million. Somehow this incident was never properly investigated and news articles about it have been scrubbed from the internet.

Bertone is also implicated in serious moral failings within the hierarchy. He knew at least as early as 2008 that Theodore McCarrick had slept with seminarians and although he was one of those responsible for placing sanctions on McCarrick, did nothing to enforce them. Also, despite his integral role in the McCarrick case, Bertone was not mentioned in the McCarrick Report.

But without a doubt, the most serious affair Bertone has been involved in was the deception surrounding the Third Secret of Fatima. Bertone, along with then-Cardinal Ratzinger and others, fabricated the interpretation of the Third Secret which was announced to the world in 2000. Their interpretation said that the ‘bishop in white’ who was murdered actually referred to the attempted assassination of John Paul II, that predictions of a chastisement actually referred to the Church’s ongoing opposition by the world and so on. Bertone met with Sr. Lucia on three occasions, claiming she approved their false interpretation as well as the inadequate Consecration made by Pope John Paul II. (For anyone with doubts: where are the fruits of this Consecration?)

It is difficult to fathom the magnitude of this betrayal by Bertone, Ratzinger, John Paul II and their clique. To firstly ignore and then misrepresent Our Lady is treachery of the most hideous kind.

If, as Archbishop Viganò suggests, Bertone is at the very least least, adjacent to Freemasonry, then this only adds insult to the injury of Holy Mother Church. Bertone should be added to the list of prelates who need our prayers: at 89, he has not much time left for conversion, and without it, an eternity in hell awaits him and all those who profit from their status in the Church or go so far as to mock the Mother of God.

IMAGE SOURCES: White House Image/Lawrence Jackson, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

I, Wulfstan, CC BY-SA 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/, via Wikimedia Commons

Pope Francis Has Rupnik’s Art in His Apartment

Published on by Kathy ClubbLeave a comment

As Catholic media has reported the Pope is hanging artwork from the notorious sex-offender Marko Rupnik in his private apartment at the Santa Marta.

The image in question can be seen in a Youtube video made by Canal de la Cuidad (City Channel), posted on August 8, 2024. The video is entitled Pope Francis met with victims of Alfredo Astiz – although they aren’t exactly victims of Astiz. More about that shortly.

Image source: El Observador

The image indicated above is unmistakably by Rupnik, with its telltale dark, soulless eyes. It is identical to the one shown below: an angel rousing St. Joseph from his sleep. Controversially, Vatican News has so far refused to stop using Rupnik’s images and this one appeared on its website for the feast of St. Joseph, Spouse of the Virgin Mary on March 19 of this year.

Now to the connection Alfredo Astiz connection. Astiz was a prominent military commender during the Argentine Dirty War (1976-1983.) He was later charged with crimes against humanity and sentenced to 19 life sentences for human rights abuses.

The video from Canal de la Cuidad was related to Astiz’ victims. It shows Pope Francis speaking with a young woman by the name of Anita Fernandez, the grand-daughter of Esther Ballestrino de Careaga , who was a left-wing activist executed under orders from Alfredo Astiz.

Ballestrino had been a great friend of Jorge Bergoglio: she was his supervisor when he worked at the Hickethier-Bachmann Laboratory in Buenos Aires. Ballestrino was an avowed Marxist and had a great impact on the young Bergoglio. George Neumayr’s Political Pope recounts Fr. Bergoglio’s thoughts on Ballestrino:

“I owe a huge amount to that woman; she taught me so much about politics. She often read Communist Party texts to me and gave them to me to read…..I realised a few things, an aspect of the social, which I then found in the social doctrine of the Church.”

After his ordination, Ballestrino called Fr. Bergoglio asking for the Last Rites to be given to a family member, even though she was personally an atheist. When Fr. Bergoglio arrived, he was told that Ballestrino in reality wanted him to dispose of the Communist literature which would incriminate her in the event of a raid. Bergoglio acquiesced (one source claims he took these books to a ‘Jesuit library’) but despite this, Ballestrino was eventually detained and ‘disappeared’.

By the time her body was found, washed up on the beach after being thrown from a plane, Bergoglio was Archbishop of Buenos Aires. Even knowing that she was a Marxist, he had her buried in the garden of the church of Santa Cruz. So, while Alfredo Astiz was not a good person, and while throwing Marxists from planes is quite inhumane, Ballestrino wielded an evil influence over the young Bergoglio, helping to form, so to speak, the anti-capitalist and humanist tendencies which are apparent in him today.

{NOTE: One more detail about the Papal apartment: this rather bizarre set of decorations are found to the Pope’s left in the video. They are quite strange and bring to mind Jago – that other sex-fiend artist who has been mentioned in these pages.}

A Rosicrucian Calling-Card on Pell’s Coffin?

Published on by Kathy ClubbLeave a comment

The very first time I laid eyes on the photograph shown below, which was almost eighteen months ago now, the single rose so carefully placed near the gold cross struck me as being odd. More than odd – it looked like the signature of someone who wanted to publicise his work. A message which might say that, “We were responsible, we had our way with Cardinal Pell.”

Such a signature in the form of a rose and cross could only mean one thing: Rosicrucians, members of that esoteric offshoot of Freemasonry known for its strange mix of Catholicism, magic and secret knowledge.

Cardinal Pell’s mortal remains lying in state at the Santo Stefano degli Abissini, just a stone’s throw from the Pope’s home.

Now of course, that rose might have been placed there by a friend, or a family member, or by some unknown cleaning lady for whom Pell always had a kind word. Which is precisely why I didn’t draw attention to it before now.

However, now that we know that Pell’s body was desecrated ( see video below if this is new to you) and now that the suggestion of murder is being unselfconsciously thrown around, I thought this might be a good time to bring it up.

The coffin seems to have been produced by this company: SCACF, as indicated by the letters in the bottom right hand corner. According to its website, this competent-looking company supplies coffins to more than 2000 funeral homes throughout the world. Presumably the funeral home that prepared the body and ordered the coffin were equally competent.

However, judging by the photograph above, (as found at the Catholic Weekly) whoever filled the screw holes on the coffin’s lid did a fairly poor job. It rather lets down the quality of the thing. Not a very professional look for the funeral home, is it?

This leads us to ponder: is it possible that the coffin left the funeral home with the body prepared to the normal high standards and with the screw-holes filled in an unobtrusive manner, and that the Cardinal’s body was desecrated after that, with the holes refilled by his unholy desecrators?

We know that it happened after the autopsy. Perhaps it took place after the all the preparation procedures had been finished, away from the prying eyes of good and faithful artisans – perhaps in the church itself?

For this church is very close to Casa Santa Marta, the home of Pope Bergoglio and his assortment of highly unsavoury sodomites – some of whom are without doubt, Rosicrucians.

For a further analysis, please see my Theory about the Desecration of Pell’s Body.

More Evidence of a Vatican S** Cult?

Published on by Kathy ClubbLeave a comment

At this point, if anyone thinks it is hyperbole to suggest that there exists a group of prelates who are involved in ritual s** abuse or at the very least, who are addicted to deviant s**, then they are beyond convincing. The evidence seems quite overwhelming.

This is not only because of the notorious abuser, Rupnik, and his uncanny knack for escaping punishment despite so many credible accusations. Nor is it because of Tucho Fernandez and the disgusting books he wrote before landing the top job at the DDF.

Marko Rupnik pictured with Archbishop Mark Coleridge at Our Lady of the Southern Cross in Springfield, Queensland, Australia. Rupnik is notoriously protected by Rome while his abhorrent works of art continue to disgrace many a church around the world, including here in Australia.

No, the idea of a formal group of deviant bishops, priests and even cardinals who are engaged in occult rituals, often involving s**, was suggested over a century ago when it became known that Cardinal Rampolla was a Mason. Not only that, but he was known to be involved with the OTO, a group for which ritual s** is its bread and butter. Since then, strange tales and mysterious events suggesting the existence of such a group within the Curia have popped up from time to time.

From “Windswept House“, and its shocking account of simultaneous Black Masses performed by high-ranking Catholic priests, to the disappearance of young girls within the Vatican walls, to the gay orgies and general air of sodomy prevalent among the hierarchy, there is no doubt that sinister forces have infiltrated the Curia’s ranks or that they are using the dark arts to further the reign of Satan. Even Fr. Gabriel Amorth – an exorcist but no great traditionalist – confirmed that Satanic Black Masses are in fact being held in the Vatican. And wherever one finds Black Masses, one finds deviant, ritual s**.

These men even arranged for children to be entertained by a drag queen at “world Children Day”!

The latest discovery which lends further credence to the existence of a s** cult in the Vatican comes from the highly informative blog, Pope Head. I have been following this Substack account for a while now, and have found it to be a good source for information relating to Masonry, especially its signs and symbols.

This recent article refers to one written at Pope Head some time ago; the original was a long post about an artist named Jago, who had created a sculpture of the late Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI. (Incidentally, I also wrote about it here.) Pope Head gave quite an examination of the artist in question, and found other works of his which are even more disturbing than his bust of the Pope: works with a theme of child s** abuse.

Before and after pictures of Jago’s sculpture, which is clearly meant as a message – an insult to Benedict or the mocking triumph after a stolen Conclave. The right-hand version, made after Benedict’s abdication, retains the Papal ring and most bizarrely, has been given a set of eyes, which were conspicuously missing from the original.

His latest article, though, asks a pertinent question: who exactly was it that commissioned the sculpture of Benedict XVI? (And the answer may well be given in the PAID section of the Pope Head blog.) It is known that someone in the Vatican commissioned it and, according to the Pope Head thesis, it looks suspiciously like that person or persons unknown had in mind Benedict’s resignation when the sculpture was first created.

Four years prior to Benedict announcing it to the world.

Two names are then mentioned by Pope Head: Cardinals Ravasi and Bertone. They jointly gave Jago an award for his original bust in 2009, so are obviously great fans of his work. (Pope Benedict himself did not care for it.)

Ravasi, as the reader may recall, is known for his “Letter to Brother Masons” reproduced here.

Bertone was once Secretary of State and was said to have been close to Benedict.

Pope Head suggests he is a Freemason (Well, he DOES have a collection of black and white scarves) who helped Bergoglio gain power and who may have been responsible for Vigano’s “sideways promotion” away from the Vatican Bank. Indeed, Bertone is singled out for blame in Archbishop Vigono’s latest missive on his accusation of schism.

Bertone was also accused of helping himself to large amounts of Vatican funds and, according to Pope Head, is all round, a “terrifying” figure.

Not only that, he actually met Sr. Lucia of Fatima on three occasions, then went on to – how shall we put it – slightly change the Third Secret, something none of us would want on their conscience at our particular judgement.

One of Jago’s earlier pieces, said to be his own hand. Erm, does that look like a BITE MARK on the index finger?

Could Ravasi and Bertone have been the ones to commission Jago’s bust of Pope Benedict AND were they responsible for forcing Benedict’s resignation?

If not they, then what Vatican official chose an artist who (at least later on) is so obsessed by the r**ing of children that he sculpts artwork using that theme? Even Jago’s relatively normal works contain some abnormal element. (See his hand, above.) The man is simply not balanced.

But then, “balanced” is not not a word that could be used to describe the Curia under the Bergoglio pontificate. Rather, it is regime marked by sexual perversion, narcissism and diabolical disorientation.

And, incidentally, those are all the ingredients necessary for a thriving culture of ritual coupling.

Masonic-flavoured honours for the Pope

Published on by Kathy Clubb1 Comment

From Aldo Maria Valli at the website, duc in Altum

(and run through Google Translate). Please do visit Valli’s excellent site for the inside story on all things Romanita.

“Thank you for such a warm welcome. And see you at the Jubilee, see you all there!”. The Pope thus took his leave, off the cuff, from the Capitoline Hill, where a plaque was placed in memory of his visit, the second after that of 26 March 2019. Then looking outside, Francis greeted with words slightly different from those usual. He said “and don’t forget to pray for me”, but immediately added: “For sure!”. Evidently he too knows well that certain prayers, especially among those raised by the Vatican and surrounding areas, are not exactly motivated by the desire that he can enjoy a long happy life.

In his speech [ here ], Francis, speaking about slavery, warned against “the fact that also occurs in our days, when, almost unconsciously, we sometimes risk being selective and partial in the defense of human dignity, marginalizing or discarding some categories of people who end up finding themselves without adequate protection”.

Coming from Bergoglio, who behaves like a tyrant, punishing and marginalizing left and right, making a mockery of the law, they sound like mocking words. But perhaps that is precisely why he asked to pray for him. Because he begins to feel the weight of the not exactly benevolent prayers of all those who have fallen under the blows of his mercy.

The text of the plaque placed in memory of today’s visit is significant: “To His Holiness Francis, successor of Peter and bishop of Rome, promoter of care of the common home and witness of universal brotherhood”. A tribute that could be perfect for any Freemason.

Bergoglio’s false Mary, Undoer of Knots.

Published on by Kathy Clubb2 Comments

Some information new to this website from the well-known Italian journalist, Andrea Cionci. Cionci wrote it a couple of years ago – the entire article can be read here. As readers of this site are aware, I am not wont to call Francis an anti-Pope or usurper: in my opinion he can inflict similar damage on the Church whether legitimately elected as Pope, or illegitimately. Cionci makes no secret of his opinion and has written an entire book on the subject – but that is not the theme of the present article.

Andrea Cionci has apparently held reservations about the devotion to Our Lady, Undoer of Knots for some time. He claims that it is based on an spell, known variously as the Witch’s Knot, Magic of the Nine Knots, or Magic Ladder. Cionci also says that it was Bergoglio who began to spread this devotion in the ’80’s. I can’t speak to that, but agree that the image shown here is quite bizarre.

The image, which is not a painting but a bas-relief, was presented to Pope Francis by the President of Argentina, Christina Fernandez de Kirchner, in 2015. Closeups of the image came from here and show some disturbing details.

For example, “Mary” is depicted with a bare shoulder: something never seen in images of the Most Holy Mother of God, who is the epitome of modesty. She is surrounded by five-pointed stars rather than the traditional six-pointed ones. The angel offends against decency & metaphysics: although angels are pure spirits and therefore without gender, this one is shown with bare breasts.

Cionci points out that the foot of “Mary” does not crush the serpent’s head, but is at best, not touching it, and at worse, caressing it. And as seen in the main photograph, the snake itself is tied in a knot.

According to Cionci, the snake-loving, anti-Mary figure resembles the occult figure, Lilith – these days a feminist icon of sexual domination and originally known in Jewish mysticism as the first wife of Adam. Lilith is often linked with the moon and is also associated with snakes. She is said to be responsible for inflicting illness or death on newborn babies. She is also associated with adultery and lust, showing another link with the “Witch’s Knot” which is tied to reproduction and fertility.

It is all very strange. And President Kirchner? After her meeting with the Pope, she exclaimed to the waiting journalists that she felt “illuminated from within” !!

Lilith_john_collier
Lilith_john_collier