Tag: Sodomy

Gay Priestess on Sanctuary during Catholic Mass

Pagan Idol Diocese allows Mass with Lesbian Priestess

Published on by Kathy Clubb1 Comment

Last week in the country town of Myrtleford, two Anglican women, one of whom is a gay Anglican ‘priestess’ joined the Catholic priest in the sanctuary during a public Novus Ordo Mass.

The Mass, part of the town’s annual Italian Festival, was offered in the grounds of St. Mary’s Church on a temporary stage and was dedicated to St. Anthony of Padua. When asked by a stunned attendee why the priestesses were near the altar during Mass, a local (who happened to be an ex-nun) stated that “we do everything together here in Myrtleford”!

Taken from the Festival website.

The eye-witness, a faithful Catholic, was shocked to see the two women consuming the Sacred Host, despite belonging to the Anglican faith. Although neither woman played an active role in the Mass, the ‘priestess’ was given a chalice to hold while Holy Communion was being distributed. She also addressed the crowd after Mass was finished.

According to the eye-witness, “One of them was trying to touch everything and finally got her hands on the incense. The priest cursed before reading the Gospel. He said “mannaggia miseria!” (This means ‘damn it’ in Italian).

Anglican priestesses in the make-shift sanctuary as the priest goes to distribute Holy Communion.
Close-up of the Anglican priestess with the chalice.

The ‘priestess’ is Moira Evers, a known lesbian and LGBTQ activist. In an article posted when she was appointed parish priestess in Myrtleford, Evers said she wanted people to ‘see the church as a place of safety.’

Moira Evers on being made parish priestess at Myrtelford’s Anglican church.
The priestesses in ‘cappae nigrae’ before the Mass
Evers after celebrating an Anglican ‘Fabulous Pride Mass’ in 2016. SOURCE

Evers is controversial even within the Anglican church because of her involvement with a same-sex advocacy group who expressed support for a Satanic Mass. There are also reports of members of her former congregation at Buderim leaving the parish because of her pro-LGBTQ stance.

The parish priest of St. Mary’s Catholic Church is Fr. Tony Shallue. There seems little hope of him being disciplined over the liturgical abuse as St. Mary’s is located in the Diocese of Sandhurst, which is overseen by Bishop Shane Mackinley. This is the same bishop who is notoriously allowing a three-month exhibition of a pagan idol related to witchcraft to remain in Bendigo’s Sacred Heart Cathedral, despite massive pushback from Catholic clergy and the faithful.

Fernandez Approves Gender Mutilation

Fernandez Approves Gender Mutilation

Published on by Kathy Clubb1 Comment

From the New Daily Compass & translated from Italian by AI.

During a conference organised in mid-February by the Catholic Theological Faculty of the University of Cologne in Germany, the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF), Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernández, made a video contribution. This report was then incorporated into a document entitled The Ontological Dignity of the Person in Dignitas infinita Some clarifications. This document aims to explain some of the conceptual points contained in the Declaration Dignitas infinita published by the same Dicastery in March 2024.

Fernández’s document was drafted to respond to some criticisms, but raises several critical issues of its own. One of these is undoubtedly the question of medical treatments aimed at so-called ‘gender reassignment’. The document, which denounces gender ideology, recalls the condemnation of such interventions already present in Dignitas infinita, but if in Dignitas infinita the condemnation was absolute, that is, it allowed no exceptions, in the recent document signed by Fernández there appears one that is decisive. Fernández writes: “We don’t want to be cruel and say that we don’t understand the conditioning of people and the deep suffering that exists in some cases of “dysphoria”, which manifests itself even in childhood. When the document [Dignitas infinita] uses the expression “as a rule”, it does not exclude the possibility that there are cases outside the norm, such as severe dysphoria, which can lead to an unbearable existence or even suicide. These exceptional situations must be assessed with great care”.

Let’s focus our attention on the part where the Prefect refers to the Dignitas infinita and quotes the the words ‘as a rule’. Let’s look at the relevant passage in Dignitas infinita: “Any operation to change the sex of a human being normally risks jeopardising the unique dignity which the person possesses from the moment of conception. This does not exclude the possibility that a person with genital anomalies, whether present at birth or developed later, may choose to undergo medical treatment to correct these anomalies. Such intervention would not constitute gender reassignment as we use the term here (60).

In essence, Dignitas infinita is right to say: no to interventions on the reproductive system when the aim is to try unsuccessfully to change sexual identity. Yes to the same interventions when they are aimed at confirming sexual identity, that is, when they are therapeutic, modifying the reproductive system in order to bring it into line with genetic data, which is the primary reference for understanding which sex a person belongs to. In fact, in certain pathologies, the reproductive organs may not correspond morphologically and to varying degrees to the person’s XY or XX chromosomes. This explains why Dignitas infinita uses the phrase “as a rule”: it wants to affirm that in the majority of cases (as a rule) such interventions are to be condemned, except for those that are therapeutic in nature.

As already mentioned, Fernández refers in his document to the expression “as a rule”, which is present in Dignitas infinita. We have seen that this expression is used by Dignitas infinita in relation to genital surgery. It is therefore reasonable to assume that Fernández also uses it in relation to these. So, if we re-read Fernández’s text, we discover that he considers these interventions to be illegal, except in cases of severe dysphoria and, implicitly, in cases of therapeutic treatment. Therefore, the Prefect considers such interventions legal even in the case condemned by Dignitas infinita, that is, when they are used to contradict sexual identity, provided that the dysphoria is severe and involves serious risks for the person. Therefore, the prohibition does not concern, as in the case of Dignitas infinita, the moral nature of the act – treatments to “change” sex – but only the condition that motivates the intervention: no to those interventions where the dysphoria is mild. In short, for the Prefect, the “change” of sex is morally acceptable when the dysphoria is severe. But surgical interventions that contradict the genetic sex are intrinsically evil acts and remain so regardless of the conditions that motivate them. This is why Cardinal Fernández has accepted the principle of “yes to sex reassignment”. Once the principle has been accepted, logical consistency will take us from borderline cases to common cases, from the exceptional to the normal.

This is why Fernández refers inappropriately to the “normal” contained in Dignitas infinita: in fact, he refers to it in order to legitimise sexual “change” in a sense that is the opposite of that indicated by the Dignitas infinita document itself. The latter declares that genital surgery is generally reprehensible, except when it is performed for therapeutic purposes; Fernández declares that genital surgery is generally reprehensible, except when it accentuates dysphoria (and when the purpose is therapeutic).

Conclusion: the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith qualifies the transsexual condition as morally acceptable.

Critical Review of Francis Bergoglio’s autobiographical book

Published on by Kathy ClubbLeave a comment

This was sent to me by the secretary of the Bishops of the Byzantine Catholic Patriarchate, with a request that it be published on my site. Although I don’t share the view that we have the authority to denounce Bergoglio as pope, I nevertheless sympathise with those who place themselves outside the institutional church in these troubled times. That said, I am in agreement with many of the sentiments written below. NOTE that THe italicised commentary is part of the original document.


The media report that Bergoglio’s autobiographical book spanning over 300 pages is set to be released on 19 March 2024. In the book, Bergoglio mentions his resignation, stressing that in this respect it is “a distant hypothesis”, since he says there are “no serious reasons” for his resignation.
Commentary: As early as 2018, Bergoglio and his homo-network were publicly called upon to resign by C. M. Viganò, Nuncio Emeritus to the US, for very serious reasons. Moreover, the fact is that Bergoglio has already excommunicated himself from the Church owing to his pseudo-gospel (cf. Gal 1:8-9). He cannot therefore be its head, as Scripture, the Church Fathers, the Doctors of the Church and the dogmatic constitution confirm. Nevertheless, he continues to illegally occupy the papal office.


The pages of the autobiographical book also traverse the history of the Argentine dictatorship during General Jorge R. Videla’s regime. Bergoglio dwells on repeated accusations addressed to him of being complicit with the dictatorship, and therefore deliberately presents himself in his book as a saviour of vulnerable children and young people. However, a federal court in Argentina investigated Bergoglio for collaboration with the military dictatorship. There are still witnesses who can provide facts and prove Bergoglio’s manipulation of information. The book is a de facto purposeful apologia for Bergoglio’s crimes, which he coldly glorifies.


Bergoglio also touches on the subject of his so-called staunch defence of human life, “from conception to death”, where he correctly labels abortion as “murder”, performed by “hired killers, hitmen!”, and the practice of surrogacy as “inhumane”.


Commentary: Bergoglio suggestively calls abortion murder and radically condemns abortion doctors as hired killers, hitmen. In reality, however, this is again just his method of psychological manipulation in order to create a favourable public opinion of him and to silence the legitimate criticisms of his opponents. The fact is that Bergoglio publicly honours mass abortionists and excommunicates priests who fight to save unborn children. The bishops deny Holy Communion to the top politicians in the US who advocate abortion up to the ninth month, but Bergoglio himself provocatively gave them Holy Communion.


Bergoglio manipulatively seems to admit his mistakes and writes: “… I made mistakes because of my authoritarian attitude, to the extent of being accused of being ultraconservative.”

Commentary: Bergoglio here gives the impression of suffering for defending orthodoxy. In fact, he is committing gross authoritarianism leading to the total destruction of orthodoxy!


In his book, Bergoglio also tries to justify his criminal pseudo pandemic propaganda. He abused his usurped authority and set a criminal precedent of dictatorship. He had the entire Vatican vaccinated twice under threat of dismissal from office. No country reached such a totalitarian state of affairs. The solid, incorruptible scientists who warned against experimental vaccination were denigrated by him as frauds.


Furthermore, his autobiography is a defence and promotion of a climate and sodomite anti-gospel. He promotes the lie about the climate crisis, and he legitimizes and blesses the sin of sodomy. In doing so, he denies the Saviour, repentance, and forgiveness of sins. He encourages youth not to maintain order and wholesome discipline, but to create chaos, ultimately resulting in moral decay and crime. Bergoglio writes: “And if some brother bishops decide not to follow this path (of blessing gay couples), it does not mean that this is the antechamber of a schism, because the doctrine of the Church is not questioned.”


Commentary: The fact is that the doctrine of the Church is not only questioned by Bergoglio but literally destroyed at the root. This is not just the antechamber of a schism, but the highest stage of Bergoglio’s apostasy – rebellion against God the Creator and Saviour. The essence of the Creed and Decalogue is denied. This proves that there is already the New Age anti-Church under the banner of the Catholic Church. Those who want to be saved must radically break with Bergoglio’s anti-gospel, and above all his suicidal Fiducia Supplicans.


Moreover, Bergoglio’s destructive activities are destroying the papacy itself. But he again manipulatively refutes this fact in his book. What is the aim of Bergoglio’s autobiography? To defend and promote the apostate path which, though diametrically opposed to Scripture and Tradition, is relentlessly pioneered by him. This path leads not only to the loss of conscience and reason, but also to the loss of eternal salvation!

+ Elijah
Patriarch of the Byzantine Catholic Patriarchate

+ Methodius OSBMr + Timothy OSBMr
Secretary Bishops

19 March 2024

Critical review of Francis Bergoglio’s autobiographical book
https://vkpatriarhat.org/it/?p=10617 /italiano/
https://vkpatriarhat.org/fr/?p=17544 /français/
https://vkpatriarhat.org/es/?p=13800 /español/


Subscribe to BCP newsletters https://lb.benchmarkemail.com//listbuilder/signupnew?5hjt8JVutE6d9VVH68P1FP5pwVnAjsSIi5iGuoPZdjDtO5iNRn8gS049TyW7spdJ

Spiritual Effects of Sodomite Priests

Published on by Kathy Clubb5 Comments

This extract is taken from Slaying dragons II: The Rise of the Occult (click here to purchase)

“The effects of sodomy on the individual, in particular on a clergyman, are so much more devastating than many in the hierarchy seem to accept in our age. This sort of devastation, as Fr Athanasius [a pseudonym] explained, can indeed make priests disposed toward occult practices. He said, “Once someone compromises the conscience and habitually lives in sin, the devil’s suggestions become more constant and acceptable. But consider the interest the devil has in high value targets such as priests. Every mortal sin of a priest is a sacrilege. It makes sense that the Enemy will concentrate on them to bring about anti-priests, anti-liturgy, anti-Church. And today we’ve got a lot of possessed clergy thanks to their sodomitical ways, You’d be surprised.” When I further asked if he thought there were occultists in today’s hierarchy, he replied, “Absolutely!”

“The compromising of the conscience mentioned by the above exorcist is surely accomplished by the enemy through the moral and spiritual effects produced by the sin of sodomy. In The Book of Gomorrah, St. Peter Damien presented the evil effects brought about by the presence of this abominable vice within the priesthood in the eleventh century. From these, and in light of the comments by Fr. Athanasius, we can see how this could easily dispose those clergy today to embrace the occult, guilty as they are of the same abominations condemned by St. Peter Damien. St. Peter Damien said that sodomy “evicts the Holy Spirit from the temple of the human heart; it introduces the devil who incites to lust.” Further, “It casts into error [and] extinguishes the light of the mind … It defiles everything, stains everything, pollutes everything.” The damage done to the priest or Bishop involved in such behaviour is immense:

In fact, after this most poisonous serpent once sinks its fangs into the unhappy soul, (moral) sense is snatched away, memory is borne off, the sharpness of the mind is obscured. It becomes unmindful of God and even forgetful of itself. This plague undermines the foundation of faith, weakens the strength of hope, destroys the bond of charity; it takes away justice, subverts fortitude, banishes temperance, blunts the keenness of prudence.

St. Peter Damien, “Book of Gomorrah”, p 63-4.

“Further, St. Peter Damien added, “This vice casts men from the choir of the ecclesiastical community and compels them to pray with the possessed and with those who work for the devils.” With all these negative effects articulated, the mind is quick to respond, “How can a man, given over to this vice, seek to govern the Church as a Bishop or priest, or lead souls to Christ, or protect the Mass, or raise up new holy priests, and avoid leading the people into error?” These men, St. Peter Damien declared, “Try with such desire to ensnare the people of God in the bonds of [their] own ruin,” and lamented, “What fruitfulness can still be found in the flocks when the shepherd is so deeply sunk in the belly of the devil?”

“Given the rampant acceptance of homosexuality in the clergy today, and the presence of these men even among the Bishops, as it was in St. Peter Damien’s day, these criticisms and laments need to be considered as we seek to understand the spiritual fallout which is the result of having these men as the spiritual leaders of the Church today.”